期刊文献+

专业类型在特里尔社会应激影响风险决策中的调节作用 被引量:1

The Regulating Role of Major Types in Risk Decision-Making Affected by Trier Social Stress Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨专业类型在特里尔社会应激影响风险决策中的调节作用。方法:62大学生分为应激组(n=30)和对照组(n=32),应激组采用特里尔社会应激测试(TSST)诱发急性心理应激感,对照组不做处理,2组大学生分别完成仿真气球模拟任务(BART)作为测试风险决策行为的指标;比较2组大学生风险决策行为得分,分析专业类型与组别的交互作用在风险决策行为上的差异。结果:应激组大学生的风险决策行为得分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.44,P<0.05);不同组别与专业类型学生风险决策行为的交互作用显著(F=3.83,P<0.05),交互作用的简单效应分析结果显示,应激组中理科学生风险寻求上的得分高于文科学生(F=11.59,P<0.05),对照组中文科与理科学生风险寻求上的得分差异无统计学意义(F=0.540,P=0.586)。结论:急性心理应激能激发大学生个体更愿意选择冒险的倾向,但受到专业类型的调节。 Objective:To investigate the regulating effect of major types in risk decision-making process affected by Trier Social Stress Test.Method:62 college students were divided into stress group(n=30)and control group(n=32).The stress group was asked to perform Trier Social Stress Test which was to induce acute psychological stress,while nothing exerted over the control group.Then the two groups completed the Balloon Analogue Risk Task as an index to test the risk decision behavior.Scores of risk decision-making behavior of the two groups were compared and the differences of the interaction between major types and groups in risk decision-making behavior were analyzed.Results:The score of risk decision-making behavior in stress group was significantly higher than that in control group(t=2.44,P<0.05).The interaction between major types and groups was significant(F(1,57)=11.59,P<0.05).The simple effect analysis showed that the score of decision-making behavior from science students was significantly higher than arts students in the stress group,(F(1,57)=11.59,P<0.05),but not in the control group.The results of simple effect analysis of interaction showed that the score of risk seeking of science students in stress group was significantly higher than that of liberal arts students(F=11.59,P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between science and liberal arts students in control group(F=0.540,P=0.586).Conclusion:The acute stress encourages individuals to choose risky behavior patterns,but their behavior was regulated by major types.
作者 张冉冉 陈永 黄列玉 张宛筑 ZHANG Ranran;CHEN Yong;HUANG Lieyu;ZHANG Wanzhu(College of Medical Humanities,Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang 550004,Guizhou,China)
出处 《贵州医科大学学报》 CAS 2019年第10期1184-1187,1192,共5页 Journal of Guizhou Medical University
基金 贵州省科技厅项目[黔科合LH字(2015)7333] 贵州省人文社科基地项目(RT201502) 贵州医科大学人文社科理论创新课题(YJ2018-26)
关键词 特里尔社会应激 仿真气球模拟任务 性别差异 专业类型 交互作用 Trier Social Stress Test Balloon Analogue Risk Task gender difference major types interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献102

  • 1郭文斌,卢永红,赵靖平,徐西嘉,赵爱玲.大学新生的焦虑情绪与容纳、应付方式[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(4):243-243. 被引量:11
  • 2彭贤,马素红,李秀明.大学生认知风格的性别差异[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2006,14(3):299-301. 被引量:50
  • 3徐光兴.性别差异的脑半球功能特殊化及其认知模块观[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2007,25(2):48-52. 被引量:11
  • 4刘启刚,李飞.大学生认知情绪调节策略对抑郁和焦虑的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2007,15(7):604-605. 被引量:32
  • 5Kahneman,D.,Tversky,A.Choices,values,and frames.American Psychologist,1984,39(4):341-350
  • 6Kahneman,D.,Tversky,A.Prospect Theory:an analysis of decision under risk.Econometrica,1979,47:263-291
  • 7Sevenson,O.,Maule,J.A.Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgement and Decision Making,New York,NY:Plenum Press,1993
  • 8Mule,J.Positive and negative decision frames:A verbal protocol analysis of the Asian disease problem of A.Tversky and D.Kahneman.In Montgomery & O.Svenson(Eds.),Process and structure in decision making.Chichester:Wiley:163-80
  • 9Ola Svenson,Ilkka Salo.Mental representations of important real -life decisions.European Journalof Operational Research,2007,177:1353-1362
  • 10Eekker HL, Legate F, Stacey D, et al. Is anxiety a suitable measure of decision aid effectiveness: a systematic review? [J] Patient Educ Counsel, 2003, 50:255-262.

共引文献98

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部