期刊文献+

Research-by-design framework for integrating education and research in an intercultural parallel design studio

原文传递
导出
摘要 Intercultural student exchange can positively impact education,research,and society.Research-by-design has been put forward in design education as an approach to explicitly address the integration of education and research.The problem is that design schools develop their own interpretation of this approach,which brings difficulty in virtually comparing and learning from the generated design proposals.This case is evident in intercultural parallel design studios that deal with diverging socio-cultural and institutional traditions.In addressing this problem and maximizing the benefits of intercultural exchange,this study proposes to adopt a meta perspective and use the design as co-evolution model as a framework for analyzing and comparing design data generated by different research-by-design approaches.The study applies this meta perspective on an intercultural architectural design studio jointly organized by Ton Due Thang University(Vietnam)and Hasselt University(Belgium).
出处 《Frontiers of Architectural Research》 CSCD 2019年第3期406-414,共9页 建筑学研究前沿(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1Brown, Roberts, Yates, Denitza Moreau,2001. Where Have You Gone Joe Dimaggio? LTSN Centre for Education in the Built Environment. In: Architectural Education Exchange. AEE2001, Conference 11-12th September 2001, Cardiff University. (http://cebe. cf.ac. uk/ aee / sessions/ dis4a. html)(accessed December 2012).
  • 2Casakin, Hernan, 2008. Factors of design problem-solving and their contribution to creativity. Available at: http://www.ariel.aca- demia. edu/HernanCasakin / ... / F actors_oCDesign_Problem_Sol- ving. Retrieved November 2012.
  • 3Cross, Nigel (2007). From a design science to a design discipline: understanding designerly ways of knowing and thinking. (http:/ / viola. informatik. uni-bremen. de / typol fileadmin/ medial lernen ITur ing-05CrossDesign.pdf) (accessed January 2013).
  • 4Cross, Nigel; Naughton, John, Walker, David, October 1981. Design method and scientific method. IPC Business Press, vol. 2 (4). (http://design.open.ac. uk/ cross/ documents/ Designmetho dandscience.pdf) (accessed January 2013).
  • 5Dorst, Kees,2003. The problem of design problems. In: Edmonds,E., Cross, N.G. (Eds.). Expertise in Design, Design Thinking Research Symposium 6. Creativity and Cognition Studies Press. University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. 17-19 November. Available at: (http://research.it.uts.edu.au/ creative/ design / papers/ 23DorstDTRS6.pdf). Retrieved September 2013.
  • 6Friedman, Ken, 2003. Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods. Department of Organization and Leadership, Norwegian School of Management, Postboks 4676, Sofienberg, 0506 Oslo, Norway. (http://design.osu.edu/ carlson/id785/friedman.pdf) (accessed January 2013).
  • 7Friedmann, A., Pile, J.F., Wilson, F., 1982. Interior Design: An Introduction to Architectural Interiors, 3rd ed. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York.
  • 8Grout, Linda, Wang, David, 2002. Architectural Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
  • 9Hill, L. Brooks, 2006. Illusions of Rationality:Confound Creative Potential. Intercultural Communication Studies, XV-3 2006 Hill. Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas.
  • 10Jones, John Chris, 1992. Design Methods, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部