期刊文献+

极低/超低出生体重儿晚发败血症的临床分析 被引量:21

A clinical analysis of late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析极低/超低出生体重(VLBW/ELBW)早产儿晚发败血症(LOS)的临床特征及病原菌情况。方法在2012年1月至2016年12月收治的VLBW/ELBW早产儿(胎龄<32周)中,选取发生LOS的患儿作为LOS组,每例LOS患儿匹配2例非败血症患儿作为对照组。根据是否发生院内死亡,将LOS组分为死亡亚组和存活亚组,分析LOS发生的危险因素、临床特征、病原菌分布、耐药情况及死亡危险因素。结果共收治VLBW/ELBW早产儿513例,LOS组65例,对照组130例,LOS发生率为12.7%。LOS组死亡6例,存活59例。LOS组出生体重低于对照组(P<0.05),LOS组经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)时间、机械通气时间、住院时间长于对照组(P<0.05)。LOS组小于胎龄儿(SGA)、机械通气、新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎、死亡比例高于对照组(P<0.05)。低出生体重、SGA、PICC时间长为VLBW/ELBW早产儿发生LOS的危险因素(分别OR=1.396、2.550、1.068,P<0.05)。合并化脓性脑膜炎是VLBW/ELBW早产儿LOS死亡的危险因素(OR=13.443,P<0.05)。LOS组共培养出65株病原菌,39株(60%)为革兰阴性菌,其中15株为产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)菌,67%(10/15)感染ESBLs菌的LOS患儿发病2周前应用过抗生素,高于非耐药菌(29%,7/24)(P<0.05)。结论出生体重低、SGA、PICC时间长为VLBW/ELBW早产儿发生LOS的危险因素,合并化脓性脑膜炎的LOS患儿更容易发生死亡。LOS病原菌以革兰阴性菌多见,发病2周前应用过抗生素可能会增加ESBLs菌感染。 Objective To study the clinical features and pathogenic bacteria of late-onset sepsis (LOS) in very low birth weight (VLBW) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.Methods Among the VLBW/ELBW infants with a gestational age of < 32 weeks who were admitted to the hospital between January 2012 and December 2016, those with LOS were enrolled as the LOS group, and those without sepsis were matched for the infant with LOS in gestational age were enrolled as the control group. According to the presence or absence of in-hospital death, the LOS group was further divided into a death subgroup and a survival subgroup. Risk factors for LOS, clinical features, distribution of pathogenic bacteria, drug resistance, and high-risk factors for LOS-related death were analyzed.Results A total of 513 VLBW/ELBW infants were enrolled, and there were 65 infants in the LOS group and 130 in the control group. The incidence rate of LOS was 12.7%. In the LOS group, 6 infants died and 59 survived. Compared with the control group, the LOS group had a significantly lower birth weight (P < 0.05) and significantly longer indwelling time of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital stay (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the LOS group had a significantly higher proportion of small-for-gestational-age infants, infants undergoing mechanical ventilation, infants with neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, or infants who died (P < 0.05). Low birth weight, small-for-gestational-age infant, and long indwelling time of PICC were independent risk factors for LOS in VLBW/ELBW infants (OR=1.396, 2.550, and 1.068 respectively, P < 0.05). Purulent meningitis was an independent risk factor for LOS-related death in VLBW/ELBWIs infants (OR=13.443, P < 0.05). A total of 65 strains of pathogenic bacteria were cultured in the LOS group, among which there were 39 strains (60%) of Gram-negative bacteria, including 15 strains producing extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), and antibiotics were applied for 67%(10/15) of the ESBL strains within 2 weeks before the onset of LOS. The rate of antibiotic use for ESBL strains was significantly higher than that for non-resistant strains[67%(10/15) vs 29%(7/24);P < 0.05].Conclusions Low birth weight, SGA infant, and long indwelling time of PICC are independent risk factors for LOS in VLBW/ELBW infants, and death tends to occur in LOS infants with purulent meningitis. Most pathogenic bacteria of LOS are Gram-negative bacteria, and use of antibiotics within 2 weeks before disease onset may increase the risk of ESBL strain infection.
作者 刘慧强 童笑梅 LIU Hui-Qiang;TONG Xiao-Mei(Department of Neonatology,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,China)
出处 《中国当代儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第10期1038-1043,共6页 Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
关键词 败血症 危险因素 病原菌 耐药性 极低/超低出生体重儿 Sepsis Risk factor Pathogenic bacteria Antibiotic resistance Very low birth weight/extremely low birth weight infant
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献24

  • 1樊寻梅.儿科感染性休克(脓毒性休克)诊疗推荐方案[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(8):596-598. 被引量:205
  • 2夏云金,刘莉荣,万楚成,郭仁慈.恶性血液病并发医院产超广谱β-内酰胺酶阳性细菌感染的临床分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(5):605-607. 被引量:13
  • 3Goldstein B,Giroir B,Randolph A,et al.International pediatric sepsis consensus conference:definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics[J].PediatrCrit Care Med,2005,6(1):2-8.
  • 4Dellinger RP,Levy MM,Rhodes A,et al.Surviving sepsis campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock,2012[J].Intensive Care Med,2013,39 (2):165-228.
  • 5Dohna-Schwake C,Felderhoff-Müser U.Early recognition of septic shock in Children[J].Klin Padiatr 2013,225 (4):201-205.
  • 6Biban P,Gaffuri M,Spaggiari S,et al.Early recognition and management of septic shock in children[J].Pediatr Rep,2012,4(1):e13.
  • 7Brierley J,Carcillo JA,Choong K,et al.Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock:2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine[J].Crit Care Med,2009,37(2):666-688.
  • 8Aneja R,Carcillo J.Differences between adult and pediatric septic shock[J].Minerva Anestesiol,2011,77(10):986-992.
  • 9Weil MH,Henning RJ.New concepts in the diagnosis and fluid treatment of circulatory shock.Thirteenth annual Becton,Dickinson and Company Oscar Schwidetsky Memorial Lecture[J].Anesth Analg,1979,58 (2):124-132.
  • 10Zawistowski CA.The management of sepsis[J].Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care,2013,43 (10):285-291.

共引文献787

同被引文献140

引证文献21

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部