期刊文献+

二语习得中书面纠正性反馈的有效性研究 被引量:1

A Study of the Effectiveness of Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 书面纠正性反馈是二语习得的正向反馈,二语习得者语言学习存在诸多问题亟待解决。近年来书面纠正性反馈的实效性遭到质疑。基于此,选取邵阳学院英语专业两个平行班级的写作课程,一个为对照班,采用传统写作教学法,而实验班采取书面纠正性反馈法,来论证书面反馈对二语习得的有效性。并在此基础上提出了二语习得中书面纠正性反馈的有效性提升对策,认为提高二语习得中书面纠正性反馈的有效性,既要强化理论支撑,也要完善反馈方式,实现目标语言与二语习得良性互动。 Written corrective feedback is a positive feedback of second language acquisition and many problems in second language learning are waiting for solutions.However,the effectiveness of written corrective feedback has been questioned in recent years.Due to this,the effectiveness of written corrective feedback in second language acquisition is demonstrated by making a case study of the writing course of two paralleled English major classes in Shaoyang University,one as a control class in which the traditional writing teaching is adopted,and the other as an experimental class in which the written corrective feedback is adopted.On this basis,the author puts forward the countermeasures to improve the effectiveness of written corrective feedback in second language acquisition.It is believed that theoretical support should be strengthened and the feedback method should be improved so as to realize the positive interaction between target language and second language acquisition,and only in this way can the effectiveness of written corrective feedback in second language acquisition be improved.
作者 唐永辉 TANG Yonghui(Shaoyang University,Shaoyang 422000,China)
机构地区 邵阳学院
出处 《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第5期94-98,共5页 Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition
基金 湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目“书面纠正性反馈对二语形态句法学习的效果和机理研究(18B429)
关键词 二语习得 书面纠正性反馈 有效性 second language acquisition written corrective feedback effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献80

  • 1陈慧媛,吴旭东.任务难度与任务条件对EFL写作的影响[J].现代外语,1998,21(2). 被引量:103
  • 2徐浩,高彩凤.英语专业低年级读写结合教学模式的实验研究[J].现代外语,2007,30(2):184-190. 被引量:148
  • 3Bitchener, J. 2008. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 17.. 102-18.
  • 4Bitchener, J. : U. Knock 2008. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students [J]. Language Teaching Research 12 : 409-31.
  • 5Bitchener, J. b- U. Knock. 2010. The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development. A ten month investigation [J]. Applied Linguistics 31: 193-214.
  • 6Bitchener, J. , S. Young b- D. Cameron. 2005. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student wrmng [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 14: 191-205.
  • 7Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 12.. 267-96.
  • 8Ellis, R. 2004. The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge [J]. Language Learning 54: 227- 75.
  • 9Ellis, R., Y. Sheen, M. Murakami : H. Takashima. 2008. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context [J]. System 36: 353-71.
  • 10Ferris, D. R. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing [M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部