重复性供述排除研究

The Study on Repetitive Confession Exclusion

《关于办理刑事案件严格排除非法证据若干问题的规定》以严格加例外的模式确定了重复性供述的排除规则。实证研究发现,在该规则确定前重复性供述在司法实践中存在被变相排除的现象;规定颁布后,重复性供述排除的成功率极低、部分法院不能正确理解排除的例外、刑讯逼供的具体手段也尚未统一。完善重复性供述排除规则还需明确刑讯逼供的含义、强调因果关系、明确认定“相同”的判断标准、鼓励法院依职权启动排非程序。

The Provisions on the Several Issues concerning the Strict Exclusion of the Illegally Collected Evidence in the Handling of Criminal Cases determines the exclusion rules for repetitive confession by strictly adding exceptions.Empirical studies show that repetitive confessions in judicial practice may also be excluded before the rule is determined.After the promulgation of the regulations, the success rate of repetitive confessions is extremely low, the exclusionary exceptions cannot be understood correctly in some courts, and the specific means of extorting confessions by torture are not yet unified.To improve the repetitive confession exclusion rules, it is also necessary to clarify the meaning of extorting a confession by torture, emphasizing the causal relationship, clearly determining the “same” judgment criteria, and encouraging the starting the illegal evidence exclusion procedure.