1BATES R O, EDWARDS D B, KORTHALS R L. Sow performance when housed either in groups with electronic sow feeders or stalls [J]. Livest Prod Sci, 2003,79(1) :29-35.
2CASSAR G,KIRKWOOD R N, SEGUIN M J, et al. Influence of stage of gestation at grouping and pres- ence of boars on farrowing rate and litter size o[ group-housed sows [J]. J Swine Health Prod, 2008,16(2) :81-85.
3VAN WETTERE W H, PAIN S J, STOTT P G, et al. Mixing gilts in early pregnancy does not affect em- bryo survival [J]. Anita Reprod Sci, 2008,104 (2-4) : 382-388.
4LI Y Z,GONYOU H W. Comparison of management options for sows kept in pens with electronic feeding stations [J]. Can J Anita Sci ,2013,93(4) ..445-452.
5LAMMERS P J, HONEYMAN M S, KLIEBEN- STEIN J B,et al. Impact of gestation housing system on weaned pig production cost [J]. Appl Eng Agric, 2008,24(2) :245-249.
6SEDDON Y M, CAIN P J, GUY J H, et al. Develop- ment of a spreadsheet based financial model for pig producers considering high welfare farrowing systems [J]. Livest Sci ,2013,157(1) :317-321.
7JANG J C,JUNG S W,JIN S S,et al. The effects of gilts housed either in group with the electronic sow feeding system or conventional stall [J]. Asian-Aus- tralas J Anim Sci ,2015,28(10) ..1512-1518.
8BATESA R O,EDWARDS D B,KORTHALS R L. Sow performance when housed either in groups with electronic sow feeders or stalls [J]. Livest Prod Sci, 2003,79(1) ..Z9-35.
9CHAPINAL N, RUIZ DE LA TORRE J L, CER- ISUELO A, et al. Evaluation of welfare and produc- tivity in pregnant sows kept in stalls or in 2 different group housing systems [J]. J Vet Behav ,2010,5(2): 82-93.
10MCGLONE J J, VON BORELLE H, DEEN J, et al. Compilation of the scientific literature comparing housing systems for gestating sows and gilts using measures of physiology, behavior, performance and health[J]. The Professional Animal Scientist, 2004, 20(2) : 105-117.
