期刊文献+

新解费尔巴哈——以《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中“三个功绩”为视角

New Opinion on Feuerbach——From the Perspective of “three merits” in “Economics and Philosophy Manuscripts of 1844”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中"对黑格尔的辩证法和整个哲学的批判",对此有两种理解。其一,马克思认为黑格尔哲学和当时德国整个哲学之间有着明显的差异,对黑格尔哲学之批判并不代表着对德国整个哲学的批判;其二,在马克思视域中,将黑格尔哲学作为19世纪整个欧洲哲学的哲学典范,在对黑格尔哲学进行批判的同时,也就批判了当时整个哲学。然而,理解的重点在于"整个哲学"是否包含着费尔巴哈哲学。关键点在于如何理解马克思在《手稿》中对费尔巴哈的态度,是批判的、赞扬的,抑或两者兼存。本文对费尔巴哈三个功绩合理之理解与评价,由此判断该时期的马克思是否是一个费尔巴哈式的人道主义的马克思。 The Notebook Ⅲ of "Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 "contains such a part "Critique of Hegel’s Dialectics and the Whole Philosophy". There are two ways to understand this:First,Marx believes that there is a clear difference between Hegel’s philosophy and the entire German philosophy of the time. The criticism of Hegel’s philosophy does not mean the critique of the whole German philosophy;Second,in Marx’s view,Hegel’s philosophy is a philosophical model of the entire European philosophy in the 19 th century. While criticizing Hegel’s philosophy,it also criticizes the entire philosophy of that time. However the point here is whether the "whole philosophy"mentioned here contains the Feuerbach philosophy. The key point is how to understand Marx’s attitude towards Feuerbach in "the 1844 Economics and Philosophy Manuscript." Is it critical,praiseful,or both? The key is to understand and evaluate Feuerbach’s three-point merits,and to judge whether Marx in this period is a Feuerbach-style humanitarian Marx.
作者 钱昌照 QIAN Changzhao(The Party Committee Organization Department, North China Univ. of Tech. ,100144, Beijing, China)
出处 《北方工业大学学报》 2019年第3期85-90,共6页 Journal of North China University of Technology
关键词 费尔巴哈 马克思 《1844年经济学哲学手稿》 Feuerbach Marx Economics and Philosophy Manuscripts of 1844
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部