期刊文献+

基于故障树-蒙特卡罗模拟的航空发动机控制系统适航审定安全性分析方法 被引量:11

Airworthiness Compliance Validation Safety Assessment Method of Aero-engine Control System Based on Fault Tree-Monte Carlo Simulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为航空发动机控制系统(FADEC系统)初始适航审定安全性分析提供一种方法.通过将FADEC系统出现故障导致发动机LOTC事件作为系统的失效状态,分析FADEC系统导致LOTC事件的系统单元,建立FADEC系统单元之间的可靠性模型,求出系统失效状态的最小割集,然后在时域内模拟系统状态的随机游走;通过计算机仿真来实现利用蒙特卡罗模拟对系统状态之间的转移时间和转移结果进行抽样来得到大量具体的系统状态,系统失效的概率用抽样得到的系统失效的频率来估计。计算单元修复率为1次/h、0. 8次/h和0. 5次/h三种情况下的FADEC系统瞬时LOTC率和平均LOTC率。结果表明单元修复率为0. 5次/h FADEC系统不满足适航要求的平均LOTC率水平,但其他情况均可以满足要求。可见该方法计算得到的保留故障要求与航空器MMEL适航文件一致。 In order to provide a safety assessment method for the aero-engine control system (FADEC system) in the initial airworthiness certification phase.The failure of the FADEC system was taken as the failure state of the engine LOTC event,and then the FADEC system units that caused the event of LOTC were analyzed.The reliability model was established between FADEC system units.The minimum cut sets of the system failure state were calculated,and then the random walk of the system state was simulated in the time domain.Through the computer simulation,The Monte Carlo simulation was used to sample the transfer time and transfer result among the system state to get a large number of specific system state.The system failure probability was estimated with the system failure frequency.Instantaneous LOTC and average LOTC rates for FADEC systems with unit repair rates of 1 h^-1, 0.8 h^-1 and 0.5 h^-1 were calculated.The results show that the FADEC system does not meet the average LOTC level of airworthiness requirements at a unit repair rate of 0.5 h^-1.But other cases,the requirements can be met.It is concluded that the deferred fault requirements obtained by this method are consistent with the airworthiness documents of the aircraft MMEL.
作者 闫锋 尚永锋 付继龙 YAN Feng;SHANG Yong-feng;FU Ji-long(Aviation Engineering Institute,Civil Aviation Flight University of China,Guanghan 618307,China)
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2019年第29期363-370,共8页 Science Technology and Engineering
基金 中国民航局安全能力建设资金项目(AADSA0020) 中国民用航空飞行学院科研基金面上项目(J2014-31和J2018-57) 中国民用航空飞行学院科研研究中心经费项目(JG2019-02)资助
关键词 全权限数字电子控制系统 系统安全性评估 丧失推力控制事件 故障树分析 最小割集 蒙特卡罗模拟 full authority digital electronic control system system safety assessment the event of loss of thrust control fault tree analysis minimum cut sets Monte Carlo simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1ZHENG XUEJUN, YANG BO, ZHU ZHE etc. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of growth of batio3 thin film via pulsed laser deposition[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2007:1441-1446.
  • 2ZHAI Guo-fu,CHEN Yang-hua,REN Wan-bin.Random vibration analysis of switching apparatus based on Monte Carlo method[J].Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A(Applied Physics & Engineering),2007,8(3):422-425. 被引量:6
  • 3Hjelmgren K, Svensson S, Hannius O. Reliability analy sis of a single-engine aircraft FADEC[C]//Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. Pisca taway, NJ: IEEE Press, 1998: 401-407.
  • 4Limnios N. Maintenance optimization of a digital engine control system with limit fallure rate eonstrain[C]//22nd Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sci ences. Harrogate: ICAS, 2000: 621.1-621.10.
  • 5United States Department of Transportation. ANE 1993- 33.28TLI-R1 Policy for time-limited dispatch (TLD) of engines fitted with full authority digital engine control sys tems[S]. Washington, D. C. : Federal Aviation Adminis tration, 1993: 7-8.
  • 6SAE International Group. ARP5107B Guidelines for time- limited dispatch (TLD) analysis for electronic engine con trol systems[S]. Washington, D. C. : Society of Automo tive Engineers, 2006:8- 9.
  • 7SAE International S 18 Committee. ARP4761 Guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assessment process on civil airborne system and equipment[S]. Washington, D. C. : Society of Automotive Engineers, 1996: 30.
  • 8United States Department of Transportation. Code of fed- eral regulation part 25 (amendment 25-123) airworthiness standards: Transport category airplanes[S]. Washington, D. C. : Federal Aviation Administration, 2007: 1- 25. 1309.
  • 9European Aviation Safety Agency. CS-25 (Amendment 9) Certification specifications for large aeroplanes[S]. Koln: European Aviation Safety Agency, 2010: 1-F- 3.
  • 10United States Department of Transportation. AC25. 1309 1A, system design and analysis[S]. Washington, D. C. : Federal Aviation Administration, 1988: 2-3.

共引文献24

同被引文献118

引证文献11

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部