期刊文献+

Chromosomal aberrations related to metastasis of human solid tumors 被引量:5

Chromosomal aberrations related to metastasis of human solid tumors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The central role of sequential accumulation of genetic alterations during the development of cancer has been firmly established since the pioneering cytogenetic studies successfully defined recurrent chromosome changes in spedfic types of tumor. In the course of carcinogenesis, cells experience several genetic alterations that are associated with the transition from a preneoplastic lesion to an invasive tumor and finally to the metastatic state. Tumor progression is characterized by stepwise accumulation of genetic alterations.So does the dominant metastatic clone. Modern molecular genetic analyses have clarified that genomic changes accumulate during the development and progression of cancers. In comparison with the corresponding primary tumor,additional events of chromosomal aberrations (including gains or allelic losses) are frequently found in metastases, and the incidence of combined chromosomal alterations in the primary tumor, plus the occurrence of additional aberrations inthe distant metastases, correlated significantly with decreased postmetastatic survival. The deletions at 3p, 4p, 6q, 8p, 10q,11p, 11q, 12p, 13q, 16q, 17p, 18q, 21q, and 22q, as well as the over-representations at 1q, 8q, 9q, 14q and 15q, have been found to associate preferentially with the metastatic phenotype of human cancers. Among of them, the deletions on chromosomes 8p, 17p, 11p and 13p seem to be more significant, and more detail fine regions of them, including 8p11, 8p21-12, 8p22, 8p23, 17p13.3, 11p15.5, and 13q12-13 have been suggested harboring metastasis-suppressor genes.During the past decade, several human chromosomes have been functionally tested through the use of microcell-mediated chromosome transfer (MMCT), and metastasis-suppressor activities have been reported on chromosomes 1, 6, 7, 8, 10,11, 12, 16, and 17. However, it is not actually known at what stage of the metastatic cascade these alterations have occurred.There is still controversial with the association between the chromosomal aberrations and the metastatic phenotype of cancer. As the progression of human genome project and the establishment of more and more new techniques, it is hopeful to make clear the genetic mechanisms involved in the tumor metastasis in a not very long future, and provide new clues to predicting and controlling the metastasis. The central role of sequential accumulation of genetic alterations during the development of cancer has been firmly established since the pioneering cytogenetic studies successfully defined recurrent chromosome changes in specific types of tumor.In the course of carcinogenesis,cells experience several genetic alterations that are associated with the transition from a preneoplastic lesion to an invasive tumor and finally to the metastatic state.Tumor progression is characterized by stepwise accumulation of genetic alterations. So does the dominant metastatic clone.Modern molecular genetic analyses have clarified that genomic changes accumulate during the development and progression of cancers.In comparison with the corresponding primary tumor, additional events of chromosomal aberrations(including gains or allelic losses)are frequently found in metastases,and the incidence of combined chromosomal alterations in the primary tumor,plus the occurrence of additional aberrations in the distant metastases,correlated significantly with decreased postmetastatic survival.The deletions at 3p,4p,6q,8p,10q, 11p,11q,12p,13q,16q,17p,18q,21q,and 22q,as well as the over-representations at lq,8q,9q,14q and 15q,have been found to associate preferentially with the metastatic phenotype of human cancers.Among of them,the deletions on chromosomes 8p,17p,11p and 13p seem to be more significant,and more detail fine regions of them,including 8p11,8p21-12,8p22,8p23,17p13.3,11p15.5,and 13q12-13 have been suggested harboring metastasis-suppressor genes. During the past decade,several human chromosomes have been functionally tested through the use of microcell-mediated chromosome transfer(MMCT),and metastasis-suppressor activities have been reported on chromosomes 1,6,7,8,10, 11,12,16,and 17.However,it is not actually known at what stage of the metastatic cascade these alterations have occurred. There is still controversial with the association between the chromosomal aberrations and the metastatic phenotype of cancer.As the progression of human genome project and the establishment of more and more new techniques,it is hopeful to make clear the genetic mechanisms involved in the tumor metastasis in a not very long future,and provide new clues to predicting and controlling the metastasis.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2002年第5期769-776,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献116

  • 1[1]Thiagalingam S, Foy RL, Cheng KH,Lee HJ, Thiagalingam A, Ponte JF. Loss of heterozygosity as a predictor to map tumor suppressor genes in cancer: molecular basis of its occurrence. Curr Opin Oncol2002;14:65-72
  • 2[2]Bckmuhl U, Petersen S, Schmidt S, Wolf G, Jahnke V, Dietel M, Petersen L Patterns of chromosomal alterations in metastasizing and nonmetastasizing primary head and neck carcinomas. Cancer Res 1997;57:5213-5216
  • 3[3]Schwendel A, Langerck H, Reichel M, Schrock E, Ried T, Dietel M, Peteren I. Primary small-cell lung carcinomas and their metastases are characterized by a recurrent pattern of genetic alterations. Int J Cancer 1997; 74:86-93
  • 4[4]Nishizaki T, Devries S, Chew K, Goodson IIIWK, Ljung BM, Thor A, Waldman FM. Genetic alterations in primary breast cancers and their metastases: direct comparison using modified comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosome Cancer 1997; 19:267-272
  • 5[5]Cobaleda C, Perez-Losada J, Sanchez-Garcia I. Chromosomal abnormalities and tumor development: from genes to therapeutic mechanisms. Bio Essays 1998;20:922-930
  • 6[6]Adeyinka A, Mertens F, Idvall I, Bondeson L, Ingvar C, Mitelman F, Pandis N. Different patterns of chromosomal imbalances in metastasising and non-metastasising primary breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1999;84:370-375
  • 7[7]Hampl M, Hampl JA, Reiss G, Schackert G, Saeger HD,Schackert HK. Loss of heterozygosity accumulation in primary breast carcinomas and additionally in corresponding distant metastases is associated with poor outcome.Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:1417-1425
  • 8[8]Choi SW, Choi JR, Chung YJ, Kim KM, Rhyu MG. Prognostic implications of microsatellite genotypes in gastric carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2000;89:378-383
  • 9[9]Yoshida BA, Sokoloff MM, Welch DR, Rinker-Schaeffer CW. Metastasis-Suppressor Genes: a Review and Perspective on an Emerging Field. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92:1717-1730
  • 10[10]Yokota T, Yoshimoto M, Akdyama F, Sakamoto G, Kasumi F, Nakamura Y, Emi M. Localization of a tumor suppressor gene associated with the progression of human breast carcinoma within a 1-cM interval of 8p22-p23.1. Cancer 1999; 85:447-452

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部