期刊文献+

制度转型与分层结构的变迁——阶层相对关系模式的“双重再生产” 被引量:180

Institutional Transformation and Changes in Stratification Structure ——Continued Reproduction of the Pattern of Relative Relations among Social Strata
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文集中讨论了制度转型与分层结构变化的关系问题 ,认为在向市场转型的过程中 ,市场机制的发展可以在很大程度上改变资源分配的过程 ,但是 ,由国家主导的改良式变迁以及一系列制度性因素 ,决定了阶层间相对关系的模式并没有发生根本性的重组 ,原有以阶层再生产为主要特征的相对关系模式在制度转型过程中仍然被持续地再生产出来。作者认为 ,社会分层模式的构成及变化 ,并非仅仅取决于经济机制或经济—技术理性的功能需求 ,而是同时在社会和政治的过程中被形塑 ,因而是特定制度环境和转型过程的结果。“市场”不仅由经济行为和经济关系所构成 ,还包含了社会、政治、文化的逻辑和权力的实施。 This paper centers on relations between institutional transformation and changes in stratification structure. In the transition to a market economy, the emerging market mechanisms are capable of changing the process of resource allocation to a large degree. However,the reformist changes initiated by the state and a series of institutional factors have predetermined no fundamental reorganization of the pattern of social strata relations,and the former pattern of relative relations characteristic of reproduction of social strata is still being reproduced. Patterns of social stratification, in the author's view, are not merely decided by economic mechanisms or the functional demands of economic technical rationality, but are moulded by social and political processes as well. Hence they are the outcome of a specific institutional environment and transformation process. The market is not solely a matter of economic actions and relations: it also includes social, political and cultural logic and power in these fields. Both economic technical rationality and economic mechanisms are found in specific institutional structures.
作者 李路路
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第6期105-118,共14页 Social Sciences in China
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1D. L.Featherman, F. L. Jones and R. M. Hauser, Assumptions of Social Mobility Research in the United States: The Case of Occupational Status. Social Science Research, 1975, vol. 4, pp. 329-360.
  • 2今田高俊 赵华敏译.《社会阶层与政治》[M].经济日报出版社,1991年版.页102-103.
  • 3彭玉生.《定类或定序依变项回归分析》,李沛良.《社会研究的统计应用》.社会科学文献出版社,2001年.第306-331页.
  • 4See J. Goldthorpe, Social Stratification in Industrial Society. In Paul Halmos ( ed. ), Sociological Review Monograph no. 8: The Development of Industrial Societies. Keele: University of Keele Press, 1964, pp. 97-122.
  • 5R. Erikson and J. Goldthorpe, The Constant Flux : A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1992, pp. 1-27.
  • 6维克托·尼 倪志伟.市场转型理论:社会主义社会从再分配向市场的转型[J].国外社会学,1996,(5).
  • 7-.国家社会主义改革中的社会不平等:在中国的再分配与市场之间[J].国外社会学,1994,(3).
  • 8See J. Goldthorpe, Social Stratification in Industrial Society. In Paul Halmos (ed.), Sociological Review Monograph no. 8: The Development of Industrial Societies, pp. 97-122.
  • 9R. Erikson and J. Goldthorpe, The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, pp. 1-27.
  • 10孙立平.《从“市场转型理论”到关于不平等的制度主义理论》[J].中国书评,1995,.

二级参考文献3

  • 1马和民,高旭平.教育社会学研究[M]上海教育出版社,1998.
  • 2高奇.新中国教育历程[M]河北教育出版社,1996.
  • 3(美)凡勃伦(ThorsteinVeblen)著,蔡受百.有闲阶级论[M]商务印书馆,1964.

共引文献148

同被引文献2606

引证文献180

二级引证文献2216

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部