期刊文献+

论英语过去分词形容词的语用制约 被引量:15

Pragmatic constraints on English adjectival past participles
原文传递
导出
摘要 英语中形容词性过去分词 (简称APP)作前置修饰语问题 ,虽已受到广泛关注 ,但对其研究不够深入。本文试图运用Levinson的信息原则、Horn的非冗余信息原则、事物摹本语义信息等语义语用学理论及其研究成果 ,通过实例分析、比较 ;揭示决定APP可接受性的种种语用制约机制 :(1 )APP必须表述名词中心词所指事物的某种状态 ;(2 )APP的语义内容必须有别于名词中心词的摹本语义信息 ;(3 )APP提供的必须是名词中心词所指事物摹本语义信息之外的新信息。 Certain distributions of deverbal adjectives based on past participles and used attributively, though widely recognized, have not been sufficiently explained. This paper seeks to elucidate the problem by providing illustrations and analyses of the essential roles played by head nouns which always exercise some pragmatic and semantic constraints on APP:(a) APP must designate a state of HN, (b) semantics of APP must not be identical with the frame semantics of HN, and (c) APP must offer new information beyond that of HN.
作者 成善祯
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第6期444-449,共6页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Greenbaum, S. & R. Quirk. 1990. A Student's Grammar of the English Language [ M]. London: Longman.
  • 2Grimshaw, J. & S. Vikner. 1993. Obligatory adjuncts and the structure of events [A]. In E. Reuland &W. Abraham ( eds. ). Knowledge and Language[ C]. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • 3Hirtle, W.H. 1969. -Ed adjectives like verandaed and blue-eyed [J]. Journal of Language 6:19-36
  • 4Lakoff, G. 1965/1970. On the Nature of Syntactic Irregularity [ D]. Indiana University dissertation.

同被引文献166

引证文献15

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部