期刊文献+

认知语用学探微 被引量:33

A Preliminary Study of Cognitive Pragmatics
原文传递
导出
摘要 认知语用学是近年来国外语言学研究中涌现出来的一个新的研究方向与趋势 ,虽然还未形成统一的理论框架和主题 ,但这些都不能否认该研究的存在。本文首先概述了认知语用学研究的基本状况 ;接着讨论了它的哲学渊源以及语用学研究中的认知转向 ;还讨论了语用学与认知语言学、心理语言学、认知心理学之间的主要联系 ; Cognitive pragmatics is a new approach to the study of natural language use. Although there appeared disagreements on its theoretical framework and focuses, its existence cannot be denied. The present study first gives a survey of its development and major achievement, and concerns its philosophical origin in semiotics, which has to some degree caused the cognitive turn in pragmatic study. After the discussion about the interrelatedness between pragmatics and cognitive linguistics, psycholinguistics and cognitive psychology, cognitive-pragmatic understanding is to be accounted for.
作者 冉永平
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第4期36-41,共6页 Foreign Language Research
关键词 认知语用学 哲学渊源 认知转向 理解 推理 cognitive pragmatics philosophical origin cognitive turn understanding and inferring
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Ariel, Mira. The Linguistic Status of the Here and Now [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 1998: 189-238.
  • 2Blakemore, D. Understanding Utterances [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1992.
  • 3Carston, R. Relevance-theoretic Pragmatics and Modularity [A]. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 9, 1997: 29-53.
  • 4Carston, R. The Relationship between Generative-grammar and (relevance-theoretical) Pragmatics [A]. W CL Working Papers in Linguistics Vol. 11, 1999: 21-39.
  • 5Clark, H. Responding To Indirect Speech Acts [J]. Cognitive Psychology 11, 1979: 430-477.
  • 6Cole, P. Radical Pragmatics [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
  • 7Fauconnier, G. Mental Spaces [M]. MIT Press, 1985.
  • 8Fodor, Jerry. The Modularity of Mind [M]. MIT Press, 1983.
  • 9Gardner, H. et al. Missing the Point: The Role of the Right Hemisphere in the Processing of Complex Linguistic Materials [A]. In E.
  • 10Perecman (ed.) Cognitive Processing in the Right Hemisphere [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1983.

二级参考文献54

  • 1冉永平.语用过程中的认知语境及其语用制约[J].外语与外语教学,2000(8):28-31. 被引量:127
  • 2徐盛桓.常规关系与认知化——再论常规关系[J].外国语,2002,25(1):6-16. 被引量:146
  • 3Clark, H. H. 1979. Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology 11: 430-477.
  • 4Coulson, Seana. 1995. Cognitive science. In Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual, ed. Jef Verschueren et al., 123-140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 5Dascal, M. 1983. Pragmatics and the philosophy of mind. Vol. 1, Thought in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 6Duranti, A. 1986. The audience as co-author: An introduction. Text 6: 239-247.
  • 7Filhmore, Charles J. 1985. ″Frames and the semantics of understanding″ [J]. Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222-253.
  • 8Fodor, Jerry. 1983. The Modularity of Mind [M]. MIT Press.
  • 9Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics [M]. Academic Press.
  • 10Geeraerts, Dirk. 1995. ″Cognitive Linguistics″ [A]. In Jef Verschueren et al. Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 111-116.

共引文献56

同被引文献262

引证文献33

二级引证文献232

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部