期刊文献+

从理性的角度探析道德和法的关系 被引量:1

A Rational Analysis on the Relationship of Moralities and Laws
原文传递
导出
摘要 There are different purposes in different types of rationality, such as between eastern rationality and western rationality, formal rationality and substantive rationality, value rationality and instrumental rationality. But they are united in a larger frame. On the basis of different types of rationality, there are different types of law and ethic. The substantive rationality causes substantive law and substantive ethic, and the formal rationality causes formal law and formal ethic. The conflict and coordination between law and ethic are because of the conflict and coordination of different types rationality .The conflict and coordination between form law and formal ethic are because of the conflict and coordination between instrumental rationality and value rationality. The conflict and coordination between formal law and substantive ethic are due to the conflict and coordination between formal rationality and substantive rationality. There are different purposes in different types of rationality, such as between eastern rationality and western rationality, formal rationality and substantive rationality, value rationality and instrumental rationality. But they are united in a larger frame. On the basis of different types of rationality, there are different types of law and ethic. The substantive rationality causes substantive law and substantive ethic, and the formal rationality causes formal law and formal ethic. The conflict and coordination between law and ethic are because of the conflict and coordination of different types rationality .The conflict and coordination between form law and formal ethic are because of the conflict and coordination between instrumental rationality and value rationality. The conflict and coordination between formal law and substantive ethic are due to the conflict and coordination between formal rationality and substantive rationality.
作者 陆自荣
出处 《社会学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第6期45-51,共7页 Sociological Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1道格拉斯·诺斯.1999,《经济史中的结构与变迁》,陈郁,罗华平译.上海人民出版社.
  • 2道格拉斯·诺斯.《经济史中的结构与变迁》,上海三联出版社1981年版.
  • 3互·费·阿斯穆斯.1987,《康德》,孙鼎国译.北京大学出版社.
  • 4里克曼.1996年,《理性的探险》.商务印书馆.
  • 5马克斯·韦伯.《经济与社会》(上、下册)[M].商务印书馆,1997/1976..
  • 6张德胜,金耀基,陈海文,陈健民,杨中芳,赵志裕,伊莎白.论中庸理性:工具理性、价值理性和沟通理性之外[J].社会学研究,2001(2):33-48. 被引量:198

二级参考文献49

  • 1寺田隆信著 张正明等译.《山西商人研究》[M].山西人民出版社,1986年版..
  • 2虞和平编.《经元善集》[M].华中师范大学出版社,1988年版..
  • 3罗光.论中庸[J].哲学与文化,1988,(2).
  • 4公刘.论"中庸"与"非中庸"[J].新华文摘,1988,(2).
  • 5杜为.《中庸本义提要》[J].孔孟月刊,1986,24(10).
  • 6冯友兰.1940,《新世训》,上海:开明书店
  • 7葛荣晋.《儒家“中庸概念”的历史演变》[J].哲学与文化,1991,18(9).
  • 8杭之.《韦伯理论、儒家伦理与经济发展的纠纷》[J].当代,1988,(23).
  • 9黄晒莉.《中国人的和谐观/冲突观:和谐化辩证观之研究途径》[J].本土心理学研究,1996,(5).
  • 10骆承烈.1989.《孔子的思想核心——和》.刊于复旦大学国际交流办公室合编《儒家思想和未来社会》,上海人民出版社.

共引文献205

同被引文献3

  • 1谢晖.西方法学家的法律诠释观(下)[J].法学论坛,2001,16(6):88-101. 被引量:4
  • 2(法)爱弥尔·涂尔干(EmileDurkheim)著,渠东,汲〓.宗教生活的基本形式[M]上海人民出版社,1999.
  • 3(德)韦 伯(Weber,M.)著,于 晓,陈维纲.新教伦理与资本主义精神[M]三联书店,1987.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部