摘要
引诱违约是民商事领域的一种重要侵权形态,侵权法介入该行为的规制,源于加强债权保护和维系市场伦理底线的双重考量。从内在合理性抑或外部功用性来看,侵权法对引诱违约的规制都应当保持谦抑品性。我国学界对此尚未有充分认知,各版民法典草案对该规定的设置也有疏漏。应通过引诱违约的区分机制、周延可行的免责条款以及能保证侵权法和合同法恰适衔接的责任设置,在制度构建中实践这一理性立场。
The inducement of breach of contract is an important form of infringement in civil and commercial field.The regulation of Tort Law.s intervention comes from the double consideration of strengthening the protection of creditor.s rights and maintaining the bottom line of market ethic.From the internal rationality or external functional point of view,the Tort Law to induce the breach of contract regulation should maintain modesty.China.s academia has not yet fully aware of this,the draft versions of the Civil Code of the provisions of the set also omissions this kind of provisions.This rational position should be practiced in the process of institution building through the differentiation mechanism of inducement of default,the feasible exemption clause and the responsibility setting which can ensure the proper connection between Tort Law and Contract Law.
基金
2015年西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划资助项目“惠普金融视野下证券合格投资者制度的重构”,(批准号“XZYJS2015135”)
关键词
引诱违约
侵权法规制
理性立场
民法典
luring breach of contract
regulation of tort law
rational position
civil code