期刊文献+

Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers 被引量:1

Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers
原文传递
导出
摘要 To adapt to the trend toward low-energy precision irrigation, the droplet distributions for two new prototype sprinklers, outside signal sprinkler(OS) and fluidic sprinkler(FS), were compared with impact sprinkler(IS). A laser precipitation monitor was used to measure the droplet distributions. Droplet size and velocity distributions were tested under four operating pressures for nozzles 1.5 m above the ground. For the operating pressures tested, the mean OS, FS and IS droplet diameters ranged from 0 to 3.4, 0 to 3.5, 0 to 4.0 mm, respectively.The mean OS and FS droplet velocities ranged from 0 to6.3 m$s–1, whereas IS ranged from 0 to 6.3 m$s–1. Being gas-liquid fluidic sprinklers, droplet distributions of the OS and FS were similar, although not identical. IS mostly produced a 0.5 mm larger droplet diameter and a 0.5 m$s–1greater velocity than OS and FS. A new empirical equation is proposed for determination of droplet size for OS and FS, which is sufficiently accurate and simple to use. Basic statistics for droplet size and velocity were performed on data obtained by the photographic methods. The mean droplet diameter(arithmetic, volumetric and median)decreased and the mean velocity increased in operating pressure for the three types of sprinkler. To adapt to the trend toward low-energy precision irrigation, the droplet distributions for two new prototype sprinklers, outside signal sprinkler (OS) and fluidic sprinkler (FS), were compared with impact sprinkler (IS). A laser precipitation monitor was used to measure the droplet distributions. Droplet size and velocity distributions were tested under four operating pressures for nozzles 1.5 m above the ground. For the operating pressures tested, the mean OS, FS and IS droplet diameters ranged from 0 to 3.4, 0 to 3.5, 0 to 4.0 mm, respectively. The mean OS and FS droplet velocities ranged from 0 to 6.3 m.s(-1), whereas IS ranged from 0 to 6.3 m.s(-1). Being gas-liquid fluidic sprinklers, droplet distributions of the OS and FS were similar, although not identical. IS mostly produced a 0.5 mm larger droplet diameter and a 0.5m.s(-1) greater velocity than OS and FS. A new empirical equation is proposed for determination of droplet size for OS and FS, which is sufficiently accurate and simple to use. Basic statistics for droplet size and velocity were performed on data obtained by the photographic methods. The mean droplet diameter (arithmetic, volumetric and median) decreased and the mean velocity increased in operating pressure for the three types of sprinkler.
出处 《Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering》 2015年第1期53-59,共7页 农业科学与工程前沿(英文版)
基金 supported by grants from the Program for National Hi-Tech Research and Development of China(2011AA100506) the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51309117) the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province(ZBZZ-018)
关键词 outside signal sprinkler fluidic sprinkler impact sprinkler sprinkler irrigation droplet size droplet velocity outside signal sprinkler fluidic sprinkler impact sprinkler sprinkler irrigation droplet size droplet velocity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1朱兴业,袁寿其,李红,任志远,谢福祺.全射流喷头的原理及实验研究[J].排灌机械,2005,23(2):23-26. 被引量:14
  • 2袁寿其,朱兴业,李红,任志远.全射流喷头重要结构参数对水力性能的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(10):113-116. 被引量:20
  • 3朱兴业,袁寿其,李红,谢福祺,陈超.全射流喷头产业化开发中的问题及其改进[J].排灌机械,2006,24(6):24-27. 被引量:5
  • 4GB/T19795.2—2005.水量分布均匀性和试验方法[S].2005.
  • 5原田正一 尾崎省太郎(陆润林 郭荣译).射流工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,1977..
  • 6John D.Valiantzas.Hydraulic analysis and optimum design of multidiameter irrigation laterals[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2002,3/4:78-86.
  • 7Darrell W.DeBoer.Drop and energy characteristics of a rotating spray-plate sprinkler[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2002,6:137-146.
  • 8《旋转式喷头》[S].JB/T7867-1997.
  • 9社河内敏彦.喷流工学-基础と应用[M].日本:森北出版株式会社,2004.
  • 10GB/T22999-2008旋转式喷头[S].2008.

共引文献25

同被引文献20

  • 1李久生.喷洒水滴分布规律的研究.水利学报,1988,(10):38-45.
  • 2Dwomoh F A, Shouqi Y, Hong" L. Field performance characteristics of fluidic sprinkler[J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2013, 29(4): 529--536.
  • 3Kincaid D C, Solomon K H, Oliphant J C. Drop size distributions for irrigation sprinklers[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1996, 39(3): 839--845.
  • 4Salvador R, Bautista-Capetillo C, Burguete J, et al. A photographic method for drop characterization in agricultural sprinklers[J]. Irrigation Science, 2009, 27(4): 307-- 317.
  • 5King B A, Winward T W, Bjomeberg D L. Laser precipitation monitor for measurement of drop size and velocity of moving spray-plate sprinklers[J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2010, 26(2): 263--271 -45.
  • 6King B A, Bjomeberg D L. Droplet kinetic energy of moving spray-plate center-pivot irrigation sprinklers[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2012, 55(2): 505--512.
  • 7Playfin E, Zapata N, Burguete J, et al. Application of a topographic 3D scanner to irrigation research[J]. Irrigation Science, 2010, 28(3): 245--256.
  • 8Bautista-Capetillo C, Robles O, Salinas H, et al. A particle tracking velocimetry technique for drop characterization in agricultural sprinklers[J]. Irrigation Science, 2014, 32: 437-- 447.
  • 9Li Yongchong, Bai Geng, Yan Haijun. Development and validation of a modified model to simulate the sprinkler water distribution[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015, 111: 38--47.
  • 10Zhu Xingye, Yuan Shouqi, Jiang Jianyuan, et al. Comparison of fluidic and impact sprinklers based on hydraulic performance[J]. Irrigation Science, 2015, 33(5): 367--374.

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部