期刊文献+

Statistical considerations for genomic selection

Statistical considerations for genomic selection
原文传递
导出
摘要 Genomic selection is becoming increasingly important in animal and plant breeding, and is attracting greater attention for human disease risk prediction. This review covers the most commonly used statistical methods and some extensions of them, i.e., ridge regression and genomic best linear unbiased prediction, Bayesian alphabet, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator.Then it discusses the measurement of the performance of genomic selection and factors affecting the prediction of performance. Among the measurements of prediction performance, the most important and commonly used measurement is prediction accuracy. In simulation studies where true breeding values are available, accuracy of genomic estimated breeding value can be calculated directly. In real or industrial data studies, either trainingtesting approach or k-fold cross-validation is commonly employed to validate methods. Factors influencing the accuracy of genomic selection include linkage disequilibrium between markers and quantitative trait loci, genetic architecture of the trait, and size and composition of the training population. Genomic selection has been implemented in the breeding programs of dairy cattle, beef cattle, pigs and poultry. Genomic selection in other species has also been intensively researched, and is likely to be implemented in the near future. Genomic selection is becoming increasingly important in animal and plant breeding, and is attracting greater attention for human disease risk prediction. This review covers the most commonly used statistical methods and some extensions of them, i.e., ridge regression and genomic best linear unbiased prediction, Bayesian alphabet, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Then it discusses the measurement of the performance of genomic selection and factors affecting the prediction of performance. Among the measurements of prediction performance, the most important and commonly used measurement is prediction accuracy. In simulation studies where true breeding values are available, accuracy of genomic estimated breeding value can be calculated directly. In real or industrial data studies, either training-testing approach or k-fold cross-validation is commonly employed to validate methods. Factors influencing the accuracy of genomic selection include linkage disequilibrium between markers and quantitative trait loci, genetic architecture of the trait, and size and composition of the training population. Genomic selection has been implemented in the breeding programs of dairy cattle, beef cattle, pigs and poultry. Genomic selection in other species has also been intensively researched, and is likely to be implemented in the near future.
出处 《Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering》 2017年第3期268-278,共11页 农业科学与工程前沿(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (31272419, 31661143013) the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2013AA102503) China Agriculture Research System (CARS-36) the Program for Changjiang Scholar and Innovation Research Team in University (IRT_15R62)
关键词 genomic estimated breeding value genomic selection linkage disequilibrium statistical methods genomic estimated breeding value genomic selection linkage disequilibrium statistical methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Meuwissen THE,Hayes BJ,Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps[J].Genetics,2001,(4):1819-1829.
  • 2de Roos APW,Schrooten C,Mullaart E,Calus MPL,Veerkamp RF. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense marker on Bos taurus autosome 14[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2007.4821-4829.
  • 3VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2008,(11):4414-4423.doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980.
  • 4VanRaden PM,Van Tassell CP,Wiggans GR,Sonstegard TS,Schnabel RD,Taylor JF,5chenkel FS. Invited review:Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2009.16-24.
  • 5Weigel KA,Van Tassell CP,O'Connell JR,VanRaden PM,Wiggans GR. Prediction of unobserved single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes of Jersey cattle using reference panels and population based imputation algorithms[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2010.2229-2238.
  • 6Zhang Z,Druet T. Marker imputation with low-density marker panels In Dutch Holstein cattle[J].J Datry Sci,2010.5487-5494.
  • 7Scheet P,Stephens M. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data:Applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase[J].American Journal of Human Genetics,2006.629-644.
  • 8Browning BL,Browning SR. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals[J].American Journal of Human Genetics,2009.210-223.
  • 9VanRaden PM,O'Connell JR,Wiggans GR,Weigel KA. Combing different marker densities in genomic evaluation[J].Interbull Bull,2010.
  • 10McCarthy MI,Abecasis GR,Cardon LR,Goldstein DB Little J Ioannidis JP Hirschhorn JN. Genome-wide association studies for complex traits:consensus,uncertainty and challenges[J].Nature Reviews:Genetics,2008.356-369.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部