期刊文献+

生态伦理视角下的政策分析理论建构及其局限 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪60年代以来,西方发达国家持续地对极限增长与绿色发展表现出了积极的关切。追其缘起,乃是生态伦理的理念下沉进而逆次中层化、制度化的过程使然。此过程的结果引发了公共政策研究的环境转向和理论建构,其中包括非人类生态存在的主体资格、成本收益的计量工具和基于价值优先性的比较方法等等。不过,尽管政策分析为实现生态伦理在政策层面的转换提供了有效的工具,但也在一定程度上简化了生态伦理内在价值,具有一定的局限性和不确定性。
作者 张毅
出处 《复旦公共行政评论》 2007年第1期195-208,共14页 Fudan Public Administration Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1张茵,蔡运龙.条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(2):317-328. 被引量:128
  • 2()阿马蒂亚·森(AmartyaSen)著,王宇,王文玉.伦理学与经济学[M]商务印书馆,2000.
  • 3LEOPOLD A.A Sand County Almanac,1949.
  • 4Duncan MacRae, Jr.,Dale Whittington.Assessing Preferences in Cost-Benefit Analysis: Reflections on Rural Water Supply Evaluation in Haiti[].Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.1988
  • 5John M Gowdy."The Revolution in Welfare Economics andIts Implications for Environmental Valuation and Policy"[].Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics.2003
  • 6Dale Whittington,Duncan MacRae Jr."The Issue of Standing in Cost-Benefit Analysis"[].Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.1986
  • 7Nicholas Kaldor.Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility[].The Economic Journal.1939
  • 8J.R.Hicks.The Foundations of Welfare Economics[].The Economic Journal.1939
  • 9Randall,A."Benefit-Cost Considerations Should be Decisive when there is Nothing More Important at Stake."[].EconomicsEthicsand Environmental Policy.2002

二级参考文献39

  • 1杜亚平.改善东湖水质的经济分析[J].生态经济,1996,12(6):15-20. 被引量:19
  • 2Carson R T, Mitchell R C. The Value of Clean Water: the Public's Willingness to Pay for Boatable, Fishable and Swimmable Quality Water. Water Resources Research, 1993, 29: 2445-2454.
  • 3Seip K, Strand J. Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods in Norway: a Contingent Valuation Study with Real Payment. Environmental and Resource Economics 1992, 2(1): 91-106.
  • 4Navrud S. Willingness to Pay for Preservation of Species-an Experiment with Actual Payments. In: Navrud. Pricing the European Environment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.6-58.
  • 5Hanemann W M. Theory Versus Data in the Contingent Valuation Debate. In: Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources-Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996. 38-60.
  • 6Kahneman D. Comments on the Contingent Valuation Method. In: Cummings R G, Brookshire D S, Schulze W D. Valuing Environmental Goods: a State of Arts Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Roweman and Allanheld, 1986. 185-194.
  • 7Baron J. Rationality and Invariance: Response to Schuman. In: Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources-Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996. 145-166.
  • 8Fisher A C. The Conceptual Underpinnings of the Contingent Valuation Method. In: Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources-Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996. 19-37.
  • 9Carson R T. Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope. In: Kopp R J, Pommerhene W, Schwartz N. Determining the Value of Non-marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods. Boston: Kluwer, 1997. 127-163.
  • 10Shogren J F, Shin S Y, Hayes D J, et al. Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept. American Economic Review, 1994, 84: 255-269.

共引文献137

同被引文献6

  • 1张秋雷,周海欧.民营企业家政治地位提高的经济学分析[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2005(5):25-28. 被引量:2
  • 2哈贝马斯 童世骏译.《在事实与规范之间》[M].北京:三联书店,2003年.第514页.
  • 3张兴成.现代性、技术统治与生态政治[J].书屋,2003,(3).
  • 4Nicholas Kaldor,“Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility”,The Economic Joural,Vol.49,No.195,1939,p.533.
  • 5J.R.Hicks,“The Foundations of Welfare Economics”,The Economic Joural,Vol.49,No.196,1939,pp.696-712.
  • 6丹尼尔.A.科尔曼:《生态政治——建设一个绿色社会》,上海译文出版社2002年版,第133页.

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部