期刊文献+

大肠腺癌5-FU门静脉插管化疗临床研究 被引量:3

Chemotherapeutic effect of 5-fluorouracil by port vein infusion for patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨 5 - FU门静脉插管 (port vein infusion,PVI)化疗对大肠腺癌患者的疗效 .方法 将 97例大肠腺癌患者 ,随机双盲分为根治性切除加门静脉化疗组 (治疗组 )和单纯根治性切除术组 (对照组 ) ;对照组住院期间不辅助化疗 ,治疗组在根治术后立即行门静脉插管化疗 ,术后第 1日开始每天持续滴注 5 - FU 1g,肝素 5 0 0 0 U / 10 0 0 m L ,共 7d.两组患者出院后系统辅助化疗相同 ,随访 5 a,观察患者术后转移及生存情况 .结果 治疗组肝转移发生率明显低于对照组(15 .4 % ,36 .4 % ,P<0 .0 5 ) ,其术后 3a生存率 (84 .4 % ,6 0 .4 % ,P<0 .0 5 )、5 a生存率 (71.1% ,5 1.1% ,P<0 .0 5 )显著高于对照组 ,术后局部复发率及其他器官转移率无明显差异 ,两组术后并发症发生率、住院时间无明显差异 .结论 对大肠腺癌患者术后进行门静脉化疗可安全有效地降低肝转移发生率 ,提高生存率 . AIM To determine the chemotherapeutic effect of 5 fluorouracil (5 FU) by port vein infusion (PVI) on the patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. The study group received 5 FU and heparin chemotherapy by PVI immediately (5 FU 1.0 g·heparin 5000 u·L -1 ·d -1 , continuing for 7d), and the control group did not receive any chemotherapy, after radical resection. All patients were followed. RESULTS The rate of liver metastasis was lower(15.4%,36.4%, P <0.05). The three year overall survival (84.4%,60.4%, P <0.05) and the five year overall survival rate (71.1%, 51.1% , P <0.05) were higher in the study group than that in control group. No statistically significant difference was observed between two groups in incidence of complication. CONCLUSION 5 Fu chemotherapy by PVI after radical resection in the patients with colorectal cancer may decrease the liver metastasis rate and increase the overall survival rate, without a significant increase in incidence of complication.
出处 《第四军医大学学报》 北大核心 2002年第21期1962-1964,共3页 Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
关键词 大肠腺癌 5-FU 门静脉 插管化疗 5-氟尿嘧啶 PVI化疗 疗效 colorectal neoplasms port vein 5 fluorouracil
  • 相关文献

同被引文献16

  • 1易秉强,肖白,吴燕.实时定量RT-PCR检测大肠癌病人外周血CK-20mRNA、CEA mRNA的研究[J].中华腹部疾病杂志,2005,5(6):391-394. 被引量:1
  • 2邵永孚,单毅,王翔,周志祥,赵东兵,王成峰,付建民.直肠、结肠癌的插管化疗[J].中国实用外科杂志,1996,16(3):138-139. 被引量:16
  • 3陈铮鸣 邵永孚.结肠癌5-FU门静脉插管化疗随机对照临床试验初步研究进展[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1995,17(6):467-469.
  • 4Wiehmann MW,Huttl TP,Winter H,et al.Immunological effects of laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery:a prospective clinical study.Arch Surg,2005,140(7):692-697.
  • 5Takeuehi H,Maehara Y,Tokunaga E,et al.Prognostic significance of natural killer cell activity in patients with gastric eareinoma:a multivariate analysis.Am J Gastroenterol,2001,96(2):574-578
  • 6Burchill SA, Bradbury MF, Pittman K, et al. Detection of epithelial cancer cells in peripheral blood by reverse -transcriptase polymerase chain reaction[J]. Br J Cancer,1995,71 (2) :278 -281.
  • 7Hayashi N, Egami H, Kai M, et al. No - touch isolation technique reduces intraoperative shedding of tumor cells into the portal vein during resection of colorectal cancer[ J]. Surgery, 1999, 125 (4) : 369 - 374.
  • 8Carcia - olmo D, Ontanon J, Garcia - olmo DC, et al. Experimental evidence does not support use of the" no - touch" isolation technique in colorectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1999, 42( 1 ) : 1449 - 1456.
  • 9Yamaguchi K, Takagi Y, Aoki S, et al. Significant detection of circulating cancer cells in the blood by reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction during colorectal cancer resection[ J]. Ann Surgery, 2000, 232 ( 1 ) : 58 - 65.
  • 10陈铮鸣 邵永孚.大肠癌5-FU门静脉插管化疗随机对照临床试验初步研究进展.中华肿瘤杂志,1995,17(6):467-469.

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部