1Bolt, D. & Stout, W. (1996). Differential item functioning: Its multidimensional model and resulting SIBTEST detection procedure. Behaviormetrika, 23, 67-95.
2Bruno D. Zumbo. (2007). Three Generations of DIF Analyses: Considering Where It Has Been, Where It Is Now, and Where It Is Going. LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT QUARTERLY, 4 (2), 223- 233.
3Bertrand R, Boiteau N. (2003). Comparing the Stability of IRT-Based and non IRT-Based DIF Methods in Different Cultural Contexts Using TIMSS Data.
4Clauser, B. E., & Mazor, K. M. (1998). Using Statistical Procedures To Identify Differentially Functioning Test Items. An NCME Instructional Module. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(1), 31-44.
5Dorans, N. J., & E. Kulick. (1986). Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the scholastic aptitude test. Journal of Educational Measurement. 23(4), 355-368.
6Dorans N J, Holland P W. (1993). DIF Detection and Description: Mantel-Haenszel and Standardization.In P.W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (p. 3-24). Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Earlbaum.
7Finch, H. (2005). The MIMIC Model as a Method for Detecting DIF: Comparison With Mantel-Haenszel, SIBTEST, and the IRT Likelihood Ratio. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(4), 278-295.
8Gregory Camilli, Rutgers. (2006). Test fairness. In Robert L. Brennan (Eds.), Educational Measurement (4th Edition) (p.221- 252). New York: Praeger Publishers.
9Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D.T. (1988). Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (p. 129 145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10Lei P, Chen S, Yu L. (2006). Comparing Methods of Assessing Differential Item Functioning in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43 (3), 245-264.
