2Thomas Lindenberg,Andrea Peters,Folkert K. Horn,Berthold Lausen,Matthias Korth. Diagnostic value of multifocal VEP using cross-validation and noise reduction in glaucoma research[J] 2004,Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology(5):361～367
二级参考文献10
1Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man:I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res, 1992, 32:433-446.
2Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, et al.The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1994, 90:65-81.
3Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, et al. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1998, 39:937-950.
4Yu M, Brown B. Variation of topographic visually evoked potentials across the visual field. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1997, 17:25-31.
5Hood DC, Zhang X. Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields:comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol, 2000, 100:115-37.
6Klistorner AI, Granham SL. Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials:effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001, 42:2145-2152.
7Baseler HA, Sutter EE. M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution. Vision Res, 1997,6:675-690.
9Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, et al. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000, 41:1580-1587.
