立法“后体系时代”命题的判断

A Judgment on the Proposition of “Post System Age” of Legislation

中国社会是否进入立法"后体系时代",需要基于现实的判断,而不能把"后体系时代"作为一个时间性概念使用。我国立法活动仍然处于不断完善阶段,法律规范尚未能调整全面的社会生活,法律部门之间和法律部门内部规则之间的冲突并没有因为《立法法》的修改得到有效的消除。《关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》之后乃至相当长的一段时期,不断丰富、充实、调适、规范各级立法仍然是"科学立法"的主要内容,其根本任务仍然是以不断完善现行法律体系为己任。立法"后体系时代"概念不仅需要时间跨度的支持,更需要"后体系"的哲学反思。

Whether China should enter the age of post system age should be based on realistic judgment instead of regarding it as a concept of time.The legislation is still in the phase of improvement,the legal norms cannot regulate the social life in a comprehensively way and conflicts between legal departments and the conflicts within the rules themselves are yet to be resolved in spite of the modification of Legislative Law.With the release of Decisions on Major Issues Concerning the Overall Promotion of the Rule of Law and even in very long time,the main content of 'scientific legislation' is to continuously enrich,adjust and standardize the legislation at all levels,and the fundamental task is to constantly improve the current legal system as its mission.The concept of 'the post system age' of legislation needs long-time support and,more importantly,needs philosophical reflection on'post system'.