论盗窃共犯刑事责任认定

On Confirming the Criminal Responsibilities of Collective Larceny

在司法实践中 ,如何认定共同盗窃行为人的刑事责任是一个比较疑难的问题 ,理论界对此争议较大。包括分赃数额说、分担数额说、盗窃总数额说及参与盗窃数额说。其中参与盗窃数额说对盗窃共犯刑事责任所提出的认定标准比较合理 ,司法实践中应予采纳。但是对参与盗窃数额说的理论真意应正确把握。同时对于某些共同盗窃犯罪分子向其他共盗分子隐瞒了共同盗窃数额 ,被隐瞒的共同盗窃行为人刑事责任的承担应坚持主客观相统一的定罪原则。

In judicial practice, how to confirm the criminal responsibilities of joint thieves is a rather knotty problem, and it causes much controversy in the academic circles. There are the viewpoints of loot amount, of share amount, of total loot, and of involving amount of stealing. Among them, the viewpoint of involving amount of stealing is quite rational to confirm the criminal responsibilities of collective larceny, hence it should be adopted into judicial practice, and its essence ought to be correctly grasped. To the joint thieves in ignorance of the stealing amount, confirming their responsibilities should follow the conviction principle of unity of subjection and objection.