期刊文献+

中国近代认识史上的困惑——谭嗣同、严复不可知论的比较研究 被引量:1

Frustration in The Modern Thinking History in China ——A Comparative Study Between TAN Si-tong's And Yan Fu's Agnosticism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 谭嗣同由于相对主义的思维方式和强调感官的局限而陷入不可知论 ,严复则由于感觉主义和推崇经验、实证而走向不可知论。这使两人对不可知论的理解及其理论归宿大相径庭。但是 ,作为近代哲学的一部分 ,谭嗣同和严复的不可知论同样具有突破古代哲学的思维定式、肯定人的主体力量和贬低肉体、膜拜灵魂的共同导向。这是近代哲学区别于古代哲学的精神风韵 。 Tan Si-tong had fallen into agnosticism as a result of the relativism and emphasizing limitations of sense. However, Yan Fu had made for it because the experiences were taken into account. They had different catch on agnosticism, and their returns of theory are different from each other. As part of the modern philosophy ,Tan Si-tong's and Yan Fu's agnosticism both broke the static pattern of the philosophy of antiquity, was human being's strength and played down the people's body but adored the soul. These are the spiritual features that distinguish the modern philosophy from antiquity's,and are similarities between of Tan Si-tongs and Yan Fu's agnosticism.
作者 魏义霞
出处 《求是学刊》 CSSCI 2000年第6期27-33,共7页 Seeking Truth
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1谭嗣同.谭嗣同全集·仁学[C].北京:中华书局,1998.
  • 2严复.穆勒名学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981,3..
  • 3严复.天演论·真幻按语[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
  • 4严复.原富[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981..
  • 5严复.救亡决论[N].直报,1895-05-08.
  • 6严复.天演论·广义按语[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
  • 7严复.原强[N]、直报,1895—03—04~09.
  • 8严复.严复集·老子评语[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
  • 9严复.天演论·新反按语[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
  • 10严复.天演论·佛法按语[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.

共引文献26

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部