期刊文献+

以审判为中心的几个理论问题 被引量:7

Several Theoretical Issues about “Centering on the Courtroom Hearings”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以审判为中心,是指在我国宪法规定的"分工负责、互相配合、互相制约"的前提下,诉讼的各个阶段都以法院的庭审和裁决关于事实认定和法律适用的要求和标准进行。以审判为中心要贯彻四大原理:第一是权力制衡原理。理论上,人身自由各种强制措施要由检察机关审查批准,物权限制要实行由检察机关批准的令状主义,自侦案件的强制措施和强制性措施由法院批准。第二是简繁分流原理。这一原理要求注重发挥庭前会议的作用、总结速裁程序、认罪认罚从宽制度试点的经验。第三是证据裁判原理。该原理要求保证证人出庭、区分证明力和证明能力、严格排除非法证据和准确把握证明标准。第四是法律监督原理。该原理要求完善立案监督、侦查监督和涉案财产的检察监督。 'Centering on the courtroom hearings' means that under the constitutional principle requiring the people's courts, the people's procuratorates and the public security organs to 'divide their functions, each taking responsibility for its own work, coordinate their efforts and check each other' in handling criminal cases, every stage of the criminal litigation shall be subordinate to the court trial, i.e., the court verdicts over the legal facts and the requirements and standards of the law application. The theory of 'centering on the courtroom hearings' consists of four major principles: firstly, the principle of 'checks and balances on power', which means that the compulsory measures targeting the personal freedom shall be reviewed and approved by the people's procuratorates, the restrictions on the property rights subordinate to the people's procuratorates' injunctions, and the compulsory measures of the self-investigation cases approved by the courts; secondly, the principle of 'division between the simple and the complex', which means that the pre-session meetings shall be emphasized, and the experience of the fast-sentence procedure and the plea bargaining re-examined; thirdly, the principle of 'evidence-based trial', which means that the appearance of witnesses on the court shall be guaranteed, the concepts of 'weight of proof' distinguished from the 'proving capacity', the illegal evidence strictly excluded and proof standards correctly applied; fourthly, the principle of 'legal supervision', which means the supervision over case filing, investigation, and the procuratorates' supervision over the property involved in the cases shall be improved.
作者 樊崇义
机构地区 国家"
出处 《法治现代化研究》 2017年第2期95-102,共8页 Law and Modernization
关键词 以审判为中心 权力制衡 简繁分流 证据裁判 法律监督 centering on the courtroom hearings checks and balances on power division between the simple and the complex evidence-based trial legal supervision
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1K.C.帕弗里谢夫,М.Ю.拉金斯基,陈森.论苏联检察机关法[J].国外法学,1981(1):38-43. 被引量:2
  • 2周永坤.权力结构模式与宪政[J].中国法学,2005(6):3-15. 被引量:62
  • 3胡云腾.证人出庭作证难及其解决思路[J].环球法律评论,2006,28(5):557-561. 被引量:59
  • 4王桂五.《关于检察学研究的几个问题》,载《检察学研究论文集》,沈阳市检察学会编1986年,第7页.
  • 5[德]恩格斯.《路德维希·费尔巴哈和德国古典哲学的终结》[A]..见《马克思恩格 斯选集》[C].人民出版社,1972年版.第212页.
  • 6[日]田口守一.《刑事诉讼法》[M].张凌、于秀峰译,中国政法大学出版社2010年版,第204-221页.
  • 7Richard May, Criminal Evidence [ M] , Sweet & Maxwell, 1986, P. 58.
  • 8[英]塞西尔·特纳.《肯尼刑法原理》[M].王国庆,李家启等译,华夏出版社1989年版,第549页.
  • 9樊崇义.《排除合理怀疑.刑事诉讼证明的新标准》[N].《检察日报》,2012-05-16.
  • 10[日]平野龙一.《刑事诉讼法》[M].有斐阁,1958年版,第8页.

同被引文献68

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部