持续性人文关怀理念在重症监护病房护理中的效果分析

Effect Analysis of Continuous Humanistic Care Concept in Intensive Care Unit Nursing

目的探讨对重症监护病房患者选择持续性人文关怀理念完成护理工作后获得的临床效果。方法方便选择该院2017年6月—2019年2月收治的107例重症监护病房患者作为实验对象;数字奇偶法分组后探究每组护理理念;比照组(53例):采用传统护理理念展开;实验组(54例):采用传统护理理念+持续性人文关怀理念展开;最终就两组重症监护病房患者焦虑评分、依从评分、抑郁评分、ICU入住时间、护理满意率、护理纠纷发生率展开对比。结果实验组54例患者中,焦虑评分为(32.15±3.25)分;依从评分为(92.65±8.05)分;抑郁评分为(32.49±1.35)分;ICU入住时间为(7.35±1.35)d;比照组53例患者中,焦虑评分为(46.59±5.25)分;依从评分为(80.25±7.39)分;抑郁评分为(45.62±5.13)分;ICU入住时间为(10.13±2.62)d;最终发现,实验组重症监护病房患者焦虑评分低于比照组明显,依从评分高于比照组明显,抑郁评分低于比照组明显,ICU入住时间短于比照组明显(t=17.141 3,8.296 1,18.179 1,6.917 8,P<0.05);实验组重症监护病房患者护理满意率(98.15%)高于比照组(67.92%)明显,护理纠纷发生率(1.85%)低于比照组(22.64%)明显(χ^2=17.461 6,10.831 2,P<0.05)。结论重症监护病房患者于临床接受持续性人文关怀理念护理干预后,在焦虑缓解、依从提升、抑郁缓解、ICU入住时间缩短、护理满意率提升以及护理纠纷发生率降低方面,均获得确切效果,最终对于重症监护病房患者康复状态的提升,奠定基础。

Objective To explore the clinical effects of patients with intensive care unit after choosing the concept of continuous human care to complete nursing work. Methods 107 patients in intensive care unit admitted to our hospital from June 2017 to February 2019 were convenient selected as subjects. The digital parity method was used to analyze each group's nursing concept. The comparison group (53 cases): using traditional nursing concepts;experimental group (54 cases): using traditional nursing concept + continuous humanistic care concept;finally comparing the anxiety score, compliance score, depression score, ICU stay time, nursing satisfaction rate and nursing dispute rate between the two groups of intensive care units. Results Among the 54 patients in the experimental group, the anxiety score was (32.15±3.25)points;the compliance score was (92.65±8.05)points;the depression score was (32.49±1.35)points;the ICU stay was (7.35±1.35)d;Among the 53 patients in the comparison group, the anxiety score was (46.59±5.25)points;the compliance score was (80.25±7.39)points;the depression score was (45.62±5.13)points;the ICU stay was (10.13±2.62)d;The anxiety score of the intensive care unit of the experimental group was lower than that of the comparison group. The compliance score was higher than that of the comparison group. The depression score was lower than that of the comparison group. The ICU stay time was shorter than that of the comparison group (t=17.141 3, 8.296 1, 18.179 1, 6.917 8,P<0.05);the satisfaction rate of patients in the intensive care unit of the experimental group (98.15%) was higher than that in the comparison group (67.92%), and the incidence of nursing disputes (1.85%) was significantly lower than that in the comparison group (22.64%) (χ^2=17.461 6, 10.831 2,P<0.05). Conclusion After intensive care of patients, the patients in the intensive care unit achieved accurate results in terms of anxiety relief, compliance improvement, depression relief, shortened ICU stay, improved nursing satisfaction rate, and reduced incidence of nursing disputes. Finally, lay the foundation for the improvement of the rehabilitation status of patients in intensive care unit.