期刊文献+

PRECISE-DAPT评分对急性冠状动脉综合征合并糖尿病患者双联抗血小板治疗后出血风险的预测价值 被引量:4

Predictive Value of PRECISE-DAPT Scoring on Bleeding Risk in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨PRECISE-DAPT评分对接受经皮冠状动脉介入手术(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)合并糖尿病(DM)患者双联抗血小板(DAPT)治疗后出血风险的预测价值。方法选择ACS合并DM患者200例,PCI术后接受DAPT治疗,随访时间为1年,记录出血事件发生情况,根据是否发生出血事件分为出血组和未出血组,评价PRECISE-DAPT评分对出血事件的预测价值。结果(1)随访期间共有66例(33.00%)发生出血事件,最常见为消化道出血,出血组平均年龄、年龄>65岁比例和治疗前PRECISE-DAPT评分高于未出血组(P<0.05);(2)PRECISEDAPT评分与出血事情呈正相关(r=0.63,P<0.01),出血发生率随着PRECISE-DAPT评分分级增加而升高,其中≥25分组出血发生危险是≤10分组的5.76倍(P<0.05);(3)PRECISE-DAPT评分对于出血风险预测的最佳截断点为16.84,其曲线下面积(AUC)为0.71(Z=5.60,P<0.05,95%CI=0.53~0.85),此时的诊断敏感度为82.27%,特异度为64.09%,阳性预测值为86.27%,阴性预测值为55.73%,准确率为73.37%。结论ACS合并DM患者接受PCI术后出血患者的PRECISE-DAPT评分明显升高,该评分对于出血事件有一定的预测价值。 Objective To investigate the predictive value of PRECISE-DAPT score on bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS)and diabetes mellitus(DM)after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods 200 patients with ACS and DM were treated with DAPT after PCI,and were followed up for one year.The occurrence of bleeding events was recorded.The patients were divided into bleeding group and non-bleeding group according to the occurrence of bleeding events.The predictive value of PRECISE-DAPT score for bleeding events was evaluated.Results(1)During the follow-up period,66 cases(33.00%)had hemorrhage,the most common was gastrointestinal bleeding.The age,proportion of>65 years old and pre-treatment PRECISE-DAPT score in bleeding group were higher than those in non-bleeding group(P<0.05).(2)PRECISE-DAPT score was positively correlated with bleeding events(r=0.63,P<0.01).The incidence of bleeding increased with the increase of PRECISE-DAPT score.The risk of bleeding in group(≥25)was 5.76 times higher than that in group(<10)(P<0.05).(3)The best cut-off point of PRECISE-DAPT score for hemorrhage risk prediction was 16.84.The area under curve(AUC)was 0.714(Z=5.60,P<0.05,95%CI=0.53~0.85).The diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy were 82.27%,64.09%,86.27%,55.73%and73.37%,respectively.Conclusions The PRECISE-DAPT score of patients with ACS and DM undergoing PCI bleeding was significantly increased,which had certain predictive value for bleeding events.
作者 李瑞瑞 刘恩香 李晶晶 刘培培 何洪月 LI Rui-rui;LIU En-xiang;LI Jing-jing(Cangzhou People's Hospital,Hebei 061000,China)
出处 《心脑血管病防治》 2019年第4期304-306,310,共4页 CARDIO-CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT
基金 河北省沧州市重点研发计划指导项目(编号:172302128)
关键词 PRECISE-DAPT评分 急性冠状动脉综合征 糖尿病 双联抗血小板治疗 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 出血风险预测 PRECISE-DAPT score Acute coronary syndrome Diabetes mellitus Dual antiplatelet therapy Percutaneous coronary intervention Bleeding risk prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献61

  • 1杨新春,张大鹏,王乐丰,徐立,葛永贵,王红石,李惟铭,倪祝华,夏昆,连勇,薛永利,马利祥.冠状动脉内应用国产替罗非班对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后心肌灌注和临床预后的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(6):517-522. 被引量:73
  • 2Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 3Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 4Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 5Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 6Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 7Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 8Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 9Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 10Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.

共引文献2211

同被引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部