论共有物分割请求权之限制——兼评“刘柯妤诉刘茂勇、周忠容共有房屋分割案”

On the Restriction of the Right to Split the Common Object——Commenting on “Liu Kezhen v. Liu Maoyong and Zhou Zhongrong’s Shared Housing Division”

共有物分割纠纷多涉及家庭等关系,应避免运用道德伦理作为主要论证理由。行使按份共有物分割请求权应以不致其他共有人不当损害为前提。当前按份共有物分割请求权制度自由有余而限制不足,于某些特殊情形难以适用。《物权法》第99条仅从事后救济层面规定了分割共有物致其他共有人损害的赔偿责任。分割共有物若将导致当事人利益天平明显失衡,须引入诚实信用原则以调整按份共有物分割请求权的自由限度。

Disputes of community division involve many relationships,and ethics should be avoided as the main argument.The exercise of the right to split the share of the common share shall be based on the premise that the other co-owners will not be improperly damaged.At present,the system of claim for division of shares is free and limited,and it is difficult to apply in some special cases.Article 99 of the Property Law only deals with the liability for the division of the common property to the damage of other co-owners.If the division of the commons will result in a significant imbalance in the balance of interests of the parties,an honesty and credit principle must be introduced to adjust the freedom limit of the claim for division of shares.