摘要
本文通过将乾隆《历城县志》与民国《续修历城县志》所载史部文献爬梳分类,并将历城史著与济南府志所见史著对比考察,试图直观体现历城史学文献撰写成果的侧重得失,联系济南史著的整体风格,考量居文化中心的历城在济南地区史学发展过程中的重要地位与引领作用;同时,本文进一步把历城县与兖州府的文教之都——儒学祖庭曲阜县的史部文献进行多方位比较,展现在齐鲁两类文化传统的激荡下,于两县史学文献撰写方面的异同反映,以期揭示历城史部文献的特殊性,对历城史部文献产生并发展的原因提出合理的解释。
This paper combs and classifies the documents of the Department of History contained in Qianlong Licheng County Records and the Republic of China Renewal of Licheng County Records.By comparing and investigating the historical works of Licheng and Jinan government records,the paper tries to directly reflect the emphasis gains and losses of the historical literature writing of Licheng and consider the important position and leading role of Licheng as the cultural center in the history development of Jinan area by connecting with the overall style of the historical works of Jinan.At the same time,this paper further compares the historical documents of Confucianism homeland Qufu County,the capital of culture and education between Licheng County and Yanzhou County and shows the similarities and differences in historical literature writing between the two counties under the agitation of Qi and Lu cultural traditions so as to reveal the particularity of the documents of the Department of History of Licheng.Finally,the paper puts forward a reasonable explanation of the reasons for the emergence and development of the documents of the Department of History of Licheng.
出处
《山东图书馆学刊》
2019年第4期89-94,共6页
The Library Journal of Shandong
关键词
方志
史部文献
历城
乾隆《历城县志》
民国《续修历城县志》
Local records
The published documents of the Department of History
Licheng
Qianlong Licheng County Records
the Republic of China Renewal of Licheng County Records