期刊文献+

权力对受贿决策的影响:性别的调节作用 被引量:4

The Influence of Social Power on Bribe-taking Decision: Moderating Effect of Gender
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:腐败是利用权力谋取私利的行为,但很少有实证研究直接探讨权力对腐败的影响。高权力是否必然导致高腐败?本研究试图探讨权力高低对受贿决策的影响及性别的调节效应。方法:研究分别采用问卷测量法(研究1)和实验法(研究2)考察了特质权力感和情境权力感对受贿决策的影响及性别的调节效应。结果:对于男性而言,无论特质权力感还是情境权力感对受贿决策影响都显著,即权力越高,个体受贿决策可能性越低。而对于女性,权力感对受贿决策没有任何效应,且女性的受贿概率显著低于男性。结论:权力仅对男性受贿决策有影响,高权力并不必然导致高腐败,受贿可能性反而降低。 Objective:Corruption is a kind of behavior of abusing power for personal gain.However,few empirical stud?ies directly explore the influence of power on corruption.Does high power necessarily lead to high corruption?The present study aimed to explore the influence of power on bribe-taking decision and the moderating effect of gender.Methods:The questionnaire survey method(Study 1)and experimental method(Study 2)were used to investigate the influence of traits of power and situational power on bribe-taking decision and the moderating role of gender.Results:For men,both traits of power and situational power had significant effects on bribe-taking decision,that is,the higher power was associated with the lower probability of accepting bribes.For women,the power had no effect on bribery decisions,and women’s probability of accepting bribes was significantly lower than that of men.Conclusion:Power only affects men’s bribe-taking decisions.High power does not necessarily lead to high corruption,but it may reduce the possibility of bribery.
作者 牛冰钰 李衷恕 定险峰 NIU Bing-yu;LI Zhong-shu;DING Xian-feng(School of Psychology,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第4期672-675,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家社科基金青年项目资助(13CSH075) 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目资助(CCNU17TS025,CCNU19TS075)
关键词 腐败 受贿决策 权力 权力感 Corruption Bribe-taking decision Power Sense of power
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

  • 1骆宏,马剑虹.护士抑郁症状与特质应对、角色认知及控制感的相关研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(3):302-303. 被引量:15
  • 2李晓广.论当代中国权力监督体系[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2005(1):39-42. 被引量:23
  • 3刘红云.如何描述发展趋势的差异:潜变量混合增长模型[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):539-544. 被引量:35
  • 4Abbink, K. (2006). International handbook on the economics of corruption, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • 5Colder, C. R.,Campbell, R. T” Ruel, E.,Richardson, J. L., & Flay, B. R. (2002). A finite mixture model of growth trajectories of adolescent alcohol use: Predictors and consequencea Journal o/"Consulting and Clinical Psycholc^y, 70(4),976-985.
  • 6Colder, C. H., Mehta, P., Balanda, K.,Campbell, R. T.,Mayhew, K., Stanton, W. R., et al. (2001). Identifying trajectories of adolescent smoking: An application of latent growth mixture modeling. Health Psycholo^, 20(2), 127-135.
  • 7Horswill, M. S., & McKenna, F. P. (1999). The effect of perceived control on risk takit^. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(2), 377-391.
  • 8Keltner, D” Gruenfeld, D. H” & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psycholf^cal Review, 110(2), 265-284.
  • 9Klein, W. M., & Kunda, Z. (1994). Exaggerated self-assessments and the preference for controllable risks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(3), 410-427.
  • 10Klitgaard, R. (1988). ContmZZing comiptfon. University of California Press.

共引文献58

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部