无过错输血损害的法律解决路径

Legal Solution to Non-default Transfusion Damage

侵权法以血液为准产品,采无过错责任,忽视了无过错输血损害的复杂性和输血行为的医疗行为本质;而在无过错输血损害中,风险存在的根本原因是血液即风险物,而非人的行为。故无过错输血损害采无过错责任,不利于医疗损害责任归责原则的统一,与临床用血和药品分而治之的现行制度相矛盾,也难以实现公平正义,故应采过错推定。

The tort law takes blood as a quasi product,adopts the principle of non-default liability,neglects the complexity of the non-default transfusion damage and the essence of the medical behavior of the transfusion.In non-default transfusion damage,the root cause of risk is blood,which is a risk itself,not human behavior.The principle of non-default liability adopted in non-default transfusion damage is not conducive to the unification of the principle of liability imputation of medical injury,and it is in contradiction with the current system of clinical use of blood and drug separation,and it is difficult to realize the fairness and justice,and the presumption of fault should be taken.