期刊文献+

新时代大学生思想政治教育实效性研究——基于批判性思维培养视域 被引量:1

Research on the effectiveness of ideological and political education for college students in the new era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 创新作为新时代中国特色社会主义建设的第一动力,要求思想政治教育必须围绕新时代高校大学生的新特点,积极发挥培养社会主义创新型人才的独特作用。创新型人才素养的提升依赖于批判性思维的养成。批判性思维不是无根据的指责,本身具有鲜明的层次性,其目的与效果之间具有动态的平衡性。在分析当前大学生思想政治教育的批判性思维养成面临的困境及现实需求的基础上,文章认为以批判性思维培养为突破口,把握顶层设计主动权,坚持主流价值导向,构建系统化立体化培养体系,筑牢道德与法治底线,对于切实提升大学生思想政治教育实效性具有重要的理论价值与现实意义。 As the first driving force of the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era,innovation requires that ideological and political education to focus on the new characteristics of college students in the new era and play an active role in the cultivation of socialist innovative talents.Critical thinking is not unwarranted accusation,nor pure emotional catharsis,still not great scourges;it is a necessary scientific accomplishment,a tool for hard work and a logical starting point for stimulating the potential of innovation.Efforts should be made to take the critical thinking training as a breakthrough,grasp the initiative of top-level design,adhere to the mainstream value orientation and build a systematic training system and the bottom line of morality and rule of law.It is of great theoretical and practical significance to improve the effectiveness of ideological and political education for college students.
作者 杨永磊 YANG Yonglei
机构地区 扬州大学文学院
出处 《淮南师范学院学报》 2019年第3期109-112,共4页 Journal of Huainan Normal University
关键词 思想政治教育 批判性思维 大学生 创新 实效性 ideological and political education critical thinking college students innovation effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1戴念祖.朱载堉的生平和著作[J].中国科技史杂志,1987,22(5):41-44. 被引量:3
  • 2罗清旭.批判性思维的社会文化历史理论分析[J].五邑大学学报(社会科学版),2003,5(3):1-4. 被引量:17
  • 3刘学礼.种痘术及其中外交流[J].自然辩证法通讯,1993,15(4):45-54. 被引量:16
  • 4Kurfiss (Gainen), J. (1998). Gritical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2. Washington DC: ASHE.
  • 5Marshall, R., Tucker, M. (1992). Thinking for a Living: Education and the Wealth of Nations. New York: Basic Books.
  • 6Dewey, J., (1933, originally published in 1910). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educational Process. Lexington, MA: Heath Publishing. US Congress, (1994) Goals 2000: National Goals for Education Act. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  • 7American Philosophical Association. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. "The Delphi Report," Committee on Pre-College Philosophy. (ERIC Doe. No. ED 315 423) .
  • 8Among these are the widely used instruments : The California Critical Thinking Skills Test, The Test of Everyday Reasoning, The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory, the California Measure of Mental Motivation, and The Health Sciences Reasoning Test, all published by The California Academic Press, Millbrae CA. Insight Assessment: www. insightassessment. com.
  • 9Allinson RE. (1991). An overview of the Chinese mind. In Understanding the Chinese mind. The Philosophical roots (Allinson R.E., ed. ), Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 1-25.
  • 10Yang KS. (1993). Why do we need an indigenous Chinese psychology? Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies 1, pp.86-88.

共引文献129

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部