论康有为、谭嗣同的三礼观

On Kang Youwei and Tan Sitong’s View of Three Classics on Rites

尽管康有为、谭嗣同的经典解读都牵涉《周礼》《仪礼》《礼记》组成的三礼,然而,两人无论对三礼的取舍还是解读都相去甚远。礼包括思想与文本两个方面,无论思想之广还是经典之多都增大了康有为、谭嗣同三礼观比较的复杂性。就对三礼的取舍而论,康有为对《仪礼》津津乐道,谭嗣同对《礼记》青睐有加。就对《周礼》的态度而论,康有为视之为刘歆伪造而贬黜之,谭嗣同视之为周公所作而力尊之。两人的三礼观既是经典观的一部分,又隐藏着不同的国学理念和学术意趣。

Although Kang Youwei and Tan Sitong’s classic interpretations all involve the three classics on rites:Zhouli,Yili and Liji,they differ far from each other both in terms of their interpretations and the choice of the three classics.Rites consist of two aspects:thoughts and texts.Both the breadth of thoughts and the number of classics increase the complexity of the comparison between Kang Youwei’s and Tan Sitong’s views on rites.In terms of the choice of three rites,Kang Youwei was fond of Yili and Tan Sitong was fond of Liji.As for the attitude toward Zhouli,while Kang Youwei disregarded it as Liu Xin’s fabrication,Tan Sitong respected it as Zhou Gong’s work.