期刊文献+

改良TESSYS技术治疗腰椎间盘突出伴腰椎管狭窄症的临床研究 被引量:1

Clinical research on improved TESSYS technology in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨改良TESSYS技术治疗腰椎间盘突出伴腰椎管狭窄症的疗效。方法:选择自2016年11月-2017年6月在我院应用改良TESSYS技术治疗腰椎间盘突出伴腰椎管狭窄症并且随访资料完整的患者30例,比较术前、术后1周、术后1个月、术后6个月的VAS及Oswestry评分。结果:30例患者术后1周、术后1个月、术后6个月随访的VAS和ODI评分均低于术前,相比较有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。术后1个月、术后6个月随访的VAS和ODI评分与术后1周比较,效果明显改善,有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后1个月与术后6个月随访的VAS和ODI评分比较,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:改良TESSYS技术治疗腰椎间盘突出伴腰椎管狭窄症是一种安全、有效的微创术式,可在临床中进行推广应用。 Objective:To explore the method and clinical effect of modified TESSYS technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods:30 patients were treated with improved TESSYS technique from November 2016 to June 2017 and were followed up,and then VAS and Oswestry score were compared 1 week,1 month and 6 months after operation.Results:Compared with preoperative situation,the score of VAS and Oswestry decreased significantly,the difference was of statistical significance(P<0.01).Compared with 1 week after operation,the score decreased 1 month and 6 month after operation,the difference was statistical significance(P<0.05),there was no statistical significant difference between 1 month and 6 month after treatment(P>0.05).Conclusion:The modified TESSYS technique was a safe and clinical effective minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis and it could be widely used in clinic.
作者 李志峰 闫虎 Li Zhifeng;Yan Hu
机构地区 泰安市中医医院
出处 《中医临床研究》 2019年第18期115-118,共4页 Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
基金 泰安市科技发展计划编号:2016NS1180
关键词 改良TESSYS技术 腰椎管狭窄症 微创 The modified TESSYS technique Lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis Minimally invasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献50

  • 1彭毛加措,项海燕,祁晓芬.经皮椎间孔入路内窥镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及安全性[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(4):1085-1086. 被引量:12
  • 2候树勋,吴闻文,商卫林,欧阳忠南,张立新.腰椎管侧隐窝分型及影响侧隐窝狭窄症诊断的几个因素(附120例CTM分析)[J].CT理论与应用研究(中英文),1995,4(1):37-41. 被引量:6
  • 3Ruetten S,Komp M,Merk H,et al.Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsursieal technique:a prospective,randomized,controlled study.Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2008,33:931-939.
  • 4Lee S,Kim SK,Lee SH,el al.Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation:classi? cation of disc migration and surgical approaches.Eur Spine J,2007,16:431-437.
  • 5Bogduk N.Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum.3rd ed.London:Churchill Livingstone,1997.
  • 6Cramer GD,Cantu JA,Dorsett RD,et al.Dimensions of the lumbar intervertebral foramina as determined from the sagittal plane magnetic resonance imaging scans of 95 normalsubjects.J Manipulative Physiol Ther,2003,26:160-170.
  • 7Neidre A,MacNab 1.Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots.Review of 16 cases and classification.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1983,8:294-299.
  • 8Hoogland T,Schubert M,Miklitz B,et al.Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the comtbination of a low-dose chymopapain:a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases.Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2006,31:E890-E897.
  • 9Tyler KL.Acute pyogenic diskitis (spondylodiskitis) in adults.Rev Neuro Dis,2008,5:8-13.
  • 10Ahn Y,Lee HY,Lee SH,et al.Dural tears in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.Eur Spine J,2011,20:58-64.

共引文献249

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部