期刊文献+

大学生学习满意度的提升路径及优化方略 被引量:13

The Advancement Approaches and Optimization Strategy for College Student Learning Satisfaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提升大学生学习满意度既符合"立德树人"的精神要旨,也是"办人民满意的教育"指导思想下引导学生成长成才的重点工作。大学生的有效参与和体验构建了学习质量和满意度,需要在把握新时代大学生学习现象与特征的基础上,基于大学生学习的本质梳理学习满意度的提升路径和落实方案设计。"国家大学生调查"(NCSS)多年研究表明大学生学习满意度既有内部结构,又必然和学习过程紧密结合。为此,全面提升大学生学习满意度可以归结为结构式路径和过程式路径两方面的路径选择。在学习体验的不断优化中,通过加强引导来完善大学生的学习过程,并重视起学习满意度所表征的学习质量,通过理论研究、制度设计和社会接轨来落实多方共建共推,共促卓越。 Improving the study satisfaction of college students is not only in line with the spirit " to foster virtue through education", but also the priority of guiding students to grow up and become talents under the guiding ideology of " education for people’s satisfaction". The effective participation and experience of college students construct the quality and satisfaction of learning, which is necessary for analyzing enhancement approaches and implementing the strategy design based on the essence of college students’ learning, on the basis of grasping the learning phenomenon and characteristics of college students in the new era. Years of research on NCSS has shown that college students’ learning satisfaction has internal structure and is bound to be closely integrated with the learning process. Therefore, the overall improvement of college students’ learning satisfaction can be attributed to the choice of structural path and procedural path. In the continuous optimization of learning experience, improving the learning process of college students through strengthening guidance, and also pay attention to the learning quality represented by learning satisfaction. Implementing the multi-co-construction and promoting excellence through theoretical research, system design and social integration.
作者 文静 Wen Jing
机构地区 厦门大学
出处 《国家教育行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第8期58-65,共8页 Journal of National Academy of Education Administration
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部青年课题(EIA140414)
关键词 学习满意度 提升路径 优化方略 Learning satisfaction Enhancement approaches Optimization strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1蒋娇龙.高校学生社团特点分析与发展对策[J].中华文化论坛,2009(S1):82-84. 被引量:14
  • 2宣勇.挑战与回应:大学学生组织的重构[J].教育研究,2006,27(4):33-37. 被引量:15
  • 3Diseth, A. Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Researeh, 2007, (2).
  • 4Cano F. Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, (2).
  • 5Prosser, M., & Trigweil, K. Perceptions of the teaching environment and its relationship to approaches to teaching [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997, ( 1 ).
  • 6Hu, L., & Bender, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternations [J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, (6).
  • 7Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leu.ng, D. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, (1).
  • 8Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & MaCune, V. Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts [J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2000, ( 1 ).
  • 9Marton, F., Wen, Q., & Wong, K. 'Read a hundred times and the meaning will appear…' Changes in Chinese University students' views of the temporal structure of learning [J]. Higher Education, 2005, (3).
  • 10Marton, F., Dall' Alba, G., & Beaty. E. Conceptions of learning [J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 1993, (19).

共引文献290

同被引文献139

引证文献13

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部