摘要
仲裁是司法外解决争议的一种制度化形式,包含合同因素和司法因素。国际体育仲裁由于仲裁员名单的封闭性、强制仲裁协议等因素,比普通商事仲裁更需要法院的审查。国际体育仲裁院作出的裁决接受瑞士联邦最高法院的司法审查。瑞士联邦最高法院审查体育仲裁裁决时,采用一级上诉机制和书面审理模式,同时,适用不干预原则,即法院不干预仲裁裁决的实体(事实)问题,除少数涉及实体性公共秩序的审查外,仅针对严重违反程序正义的几条上诉理由作出裁判。
Arbitration is an alternative disputes resolution,which includes contract and judicial factors.Comparing with traditional arbitration,sports arbitration needs more review from the Swiss Federal Tribunal,owing to which has the closed list of arbitrators and forced arbitration agreements.Swiss Federal Tribunal uses oneinstance and documents-only basis to review the sport arbitrations,and the non-intervention principle has been applied into practice.Apart from the cases in relation to the substantive public order,the Swiss Federal Tribunal does not examine the legal fact in practice,and the judgement is made based on the procedural issue.
出处
《苏州大学学报(法学版)》
2019年第3期1-13,共13页
Journal of Soochow University:Law Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国体育深化改革重大问题的法律研究”(项目编号:16ZDA225)的阶段性成果
关键词
体育仲裁
司法审查
法理
Sport Arbitration
Judicial Review
Jurisprudence