期刊文献+

经椎旁肌间隙入路治疗胸腰椎骨折疗效及对预后影响 被引量:4

Effect and prognosis of patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures by paraspinal muscle-space approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经椎旁肌间隙入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效及对预后的影响。方法回顾性分析武汉市中医医院自2017年1月至2018年1月收治的85例胸腰椎骨折患者的临床资料,分成A组(n=40)与B组(n=45)。A组采取正中入路,B组采取经椎旁肌间隙入路。比较两组的手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后卧床时间、住院时间等围术期指标,比较手术前、后视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日本骨科协会评估治疗评分(JOA)、日常生活能力(ADL)评分、Cobb角及椎体前缘相对高度。结果B组患者围术期指标均优于A组;B组患者术后1、3个月的VAS评分明显低于A组,JOA评分明显高于A组,ADL评分明显高于A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后,两组患者Cobb角、椎体前缘相对高度均较术前改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论椎旁间隙入路手术治疗胸腰椎骨折,具有手术创伤小、操作简单、出血少、恢复快等特点,术后腰背疼痛症状明显缓解,预后较好。 Objective To investigate the effect and prognosis of paraspinal muscle-space approach on patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures.Methods A retrospective study was performed on 85 cases of patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures who were admitted from January 2017 to January 2018.Patients were divided into the Group A(median approach,n=40)and Group B(paraspinal muscle space approach,n=45).Two groups of incision length,operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative such as flow rate,length of hospital stay,postoperative bed time,perioperative indicators,compare the visual analogue scale(VAS)before and after surgery,the Japanese orthopaedic association evaluation score(JOA)treatment and activity of daily life(ADL)score,Cobb Angle and fanterior edge relative height were compared.Results The perioperative indexes of the patients in Group B were all better than those in Group A,and the VAS scores of the patients in Group B at 1 and 3 months after the operation were significantly lower than those in Group A,JOA scores were significantly higher than those in Group A,and ADL scores were significantly higher than those in Group A,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The Cobb Angle and the relative height of the anterior edge of the vertebral body in the two groups were improved after operation(P<0.05).Conclusion Paraspinal space approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures has the advantages of less trauma,simple operation,less bleeding and fast prognosis.It can relieve the symptoms of lumbar back pain and improve the daily life of patients after operation and can be used as the main treatment of thoracolumbar fracture.
作者 梅凌 董晓俊 张朝阳 覃剑 赵敏 李冬 彭博文 张涛 MEI Ling;DONG Xiao-jun;ZHANG Chao-yang;QIN Jian;ZHAO Min;LI Dong;PENG Bo-wen;ZHANG Tao(Department of Bone Traumatology,Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuhan 430014,China)
出处 《创伤与急危重病医学》 2019年第5期287-289,共3页 Trauma and Critical Care Medicine
基金 武汉市卫计委课题(WZ14D12)
关键词 椎旁间隙入路 胸腰椎骨折 疼痛改善 日常生活能力评分 Paraspinal muscle space approach Thoracolumbar fracture Pain improvement Activity of daily life score
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献94

  • 1池永龙,徐华梓,林焱,黄其杉,毛方敏,倪文飞.微创经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的初步探讨[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(21):1307-1311. 被引量:125
  • 2Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1968,50(5) : 919-926.
  • 3Turner NM,van de Leemput AJ,Draaisma JM,et al. Validity of the visual analogue scale as an instrument to measure self-efficacy in resuscitation skills[J]. Med Educ,2008,42(5) : 503-511.
  • 4Kraemer WJ,Schemitsch EH,Lever J,et al. Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit [J]. J Or- thop Trauma, 1996,10(8) :541-544.
  • 5Kim KT,Lee SH,Suk KS,et al. The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2006,31(6) :712-716.
  • 6Hirano T, Hasegawa K,Takabashi HE, et al. Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability [J]. Spine, 1997,22 (21) :2504-2509.
  • 7Angevine PD,Dickman CA, Me Cormick PC. Lumbar fusion with and without pedicle screw fixation:comments on a prospective, randomized study[ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) ,2007,32 ( 13 ) : 1466-1471.
  • 8李楠,张贵林,田伟,张波,袁强,行永刚,刘波,李勤.经椎旁肌入路治疗胸腰段椎体骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(5):379-382. 被引量:73
  • 9方向前,胡志军,范顺武,赵兴,黄悦,赵凤东,陈剑.胸腰段骨折经肌间隙入路与传统入路内固定的比较研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2009,29(4):315-319. 被引量:136
  • 10陈艺,白波,孙辉,吴景明,廖壮文,田联房,邓国勇,吴梅祥.短节段椎弓根钉固定术的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤杂志,2010,26(1):39-43. 被引量:49

共引文献131

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部