期刊文献+

美对中25%的惩罚性关税究竟惩罚了谁?——基于价格分担和福利损失分担等的量化测度 被引量:2

Who is Punished by the 25% Punitive Tariff of the United States?——Quantification Measurement Based on Price Sharing and Benefit Loss Sharing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于涉征商品本身的必需品类归属,且替代产地极其有限,因此美国对中国2 500亿美元进口商品加征25%的惩罚性关税,对美国的冲击要大于对中国的冲击。在加税的价格分担方面,美国消费者和中国企业将分别分担加税的64%和36%,前者是后者的1.78倍。就加税的社会福利损失而言,加税后总体社会福利损失8.45%和17.45亿美元,其中美国消费者剩余损失16.15%和21.24亿美元,中国出口企业生产者剩余反而会增长5.06%和3.80亿美元。另外,加税后中国外贸生产(就业)虽然会下降8.32%,但外贸出口总值反而会逆势增长5.07%。由此,美对中加征惩罚性关税,最终惩罚的主要是美国自己,而非中国! Because of the necessity category of the goods itself and the extremely limited alternative production area,the United States’punitive tariffs on Chinese exports has much more impact on the United States itself than on China.In terms of price-sharing of the 25%tax increase,U.S.consumers and Chinese companies will share 64%and 36%respectively,the former is 1.78 times of the latter.In terms of social welfare losses,the overall social welfare loss after tax increases is 8.45%and 1.745 billion dollars.Among which the U.S.consumer surplus loss 16.15%and 2.124 billion dollars and the surplus of Chinese exporters will increase by 5.06%and 380 million dollars.In addition,China foreign trade production(employment)will drop 8.32%after tax increase,but the total value of foreign trade exports will rise 5.07%in reverse trend.So the United States’punitive tariffs on China will mainly punish the US itself,but not China.
作者 马文军 翟小清 MA Wen-jun;ZHAI Xiao-qing(Business School,Ludong University,Yantai 264025,China;Guanghua Management School,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第10期85-91,共7页 East China Economic Management
关键词 中美贸易摩擦 关税惩罚 价格分担 福利损失分担 Sino-US trade friction tariff punishment price sharing welfare loss sharing
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献43

  • 1朱启荣.一般贸易与加工贸易对我国GDP影响的实证分析[J].山东经济,2007,23(1):5-7. 被引量:5
  • 2(日)金森久雄.景气预测入门[M].日本经济新闻社,1977..
  • 3IMF.中国经济改革的新阶段[M].北京:中国金融出版社,1994..
  • 4Hooper P, et al. Trade elasticities for the G- 7 countries, Princeton University: Princeton Studies in International Fmonomics [ R ]. Department of Economics, 2000,No. 87.
  • 5Jacques R A, Maleom D K. Issues in the Assessment of the Exchange Rates of Industrial Countries [R]. Washington D C. International Monetary Fund, Occasional Paper 29 ,July 1984, Table 4.
  • 6张曙光,张燕生,万中心.中国贸易保护代价的实证分析[J].经济研究,1997,32(2):12-22. 被引量:29
  • 7Arellano, M. and S. Bond, 1991, "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and An Application to Employment Equations," Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2) :277-297.
  • 8Dixit, A. K. and J. E. Stiglitz, 1977, "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," The American Econom-ic Review, 67(3) :297-308.
  • 9Feenstra, R.C., Z. Li and M. Yu, 2013, "Exports and Credit Constraints under Incomplete Information: Theory and Evi- dence from China, "NBER Working Paper, No. 16940.
  • 10Levinsohn, J. and A. Petrin, 2003, "Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables, "Review of Economic Studies, 70(2) :317-341.

共引文献253

同被引文献49

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部