期刊文献+

论人格权请求权在个人信息权上行使的必要性及规则

On the Necessity and Rules of Exercising the Right of Personal Right Claim in the Right of Personal Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 个人信息被侵害的救济,在我国主要依据侵权法的规定。侵权法上救济的不足主要体现在救济时间的滞后性、精神损害赔偿的限额性与间接损害性、诉讼中法律关系主体的多样性、举证和事实认定的复杂性和诉讼时效的确定性。人格权请求权作为一种独立的事前救济权利,不仅可以圆满地弥补侵权法上对个人信息权保护的不足,还能与域外国家的个人信息保护法上规定的积极请求权产生聚合效应,进而完善整个救济体系。人格权请求权在个人信息权救济的具体行使方式上,依类型划分,可分为人格紧密型的行使方式与人格疏远型的行使方式。 The relief of personal information is mainly based on the tort law in China.The inadequacy of remedy in tort law is mainly reflected in the lag of remedy time,the limitation of compensation for mental damage and indirect harm,the diversity of subjects of legal relations in litigation,the complexity of evidence and fact determination and the certainty of limitation of action.As an independent prior relief right,the claim of personal right can not only make up for the deficiency of the protection of personal information right in the tort law,but also produce aggregation effect with the active claim right in the personal information protection law of foreign countries,so as to improve the whole relief system.In terms of the specific ways of exercising the right of personal information relief,the right to claim for personal right can be divided into two types,namely,the tight exercising way of personality and the alienated exercising way of personality.
作者 庄剑峰 ZHUANG Jianfeng(School of Law,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou,Fujian 350108)
机构地区 福州大学法学院
出处 《武夷学院学报》 2019年第8期26-31,共6页 Journal of Wuyi University
关键词 个人信息权 人格权请求权 侵权请求权 人格疏远型 人格紧密型 personal information rights right of claim for personal right right of claim for infringement personality alienation type personality tight type
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献68

共引文献375

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部