摘要
赖欣巴赫的“两种语境”界定了科学哲学的研究范围。这种对科学理论的逻辑重构,通过对“发现的语境”的消除,使科学哲学遗忘了科学得以起源与演化的生活世界,导致对科学本性长期误读,进而产生了伦理意义上的“恶”,最终演变为欧洲科学危机。只有汲取科学论等相关领域的养分,让哲学重构回归科学实践,才能摆脱此种困境。
Hans Reichenbach’s the distinction between context of justification and context of discovery defines the realm of philosophy of science.However,the rational reconstruction excludes the process of discovery or action in science.The exclusion leads philosophy of science to forget the lifeworld of science and causes a lasting misreading of the nature of science,which further results in ethical“evils”and finally evolved into the crisis of European sciences.Let philosophy go back to the practice of science,such as,combining with science studies,and it is a correct way to get rid of the dilemma.
作者
武天欣
蔡仲
WU Tian-xin;CAI Zhong(Department of Philosophy,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期37-42,共6页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金
江苏省社会科学基金项目“当代技科学哲学的合理性研究”(18WXB002)
关键词
生活世界
两种语境之分
科学实践
life-world
the distinction of two contexts
practice of science