摘要
道义论的认知辩护蕴含了信念控制的观点,斯代普的信念兼容论就是一种信念控制理论。该理论将理由回应性、“好”的因果历史、信念控制等同起来,说明了主体如何控制信念形成。但是它面临着两个问题:(1)无法回应实践理由,(2)道义论标准失效。为了解决这两个问题,应该以“承诺历史”替代“好”的因果历史,以理由回应性、承诺历史、信念控制的等同关系替代原先的等同关系。
Deontological epistemological justification entails the view of belief control.Steup’s doxastic compatibilism is a theory of belief control.This theory equates reason responsiveness with“good”causal history and belief control to explain how the subject controls belief formation,but it faces two problems:(1)unable to respond to practical reasons;(2)the failure of deontic standards.In order to solve these problems,we should substitute“commitment history”for“good”causal history,and make the equivalence of reason responsiveness,commitment history and belief control replace the original equivalent relation.
作者
见雷
JIAN Lei(The College of Humanities and Foreign Languages,China Jiliang University,Hangzhou 310018,China)
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期49-55,共7页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
关键词
信念兼容论
因果历史
认知承诺
doxastic compatibilism
causal history
cognitive commitment