公司司法解散的实证分析

An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Dissolution of Companies

公司司法解散是指当公司出现僵局,法律规定的适格主体诉请法院判决予以公司解散的救济途径。行权股东、被诉公司、法院裁判是公司司法解散制度的三方主体,《中华人民共和国公司法》第一百八十二条对公司司法解散制度适用的情形规定得较为模糊,导致法院判决时有不同的评判标准。通过实证分析,发现我国公司司法解散制度存在三个问题:一是对“其他严重困难”认定不明确;二是重大损失标准无法确定;三是司法解散措施不够全面。需要提出细化其他严重困难认定标准,拓宽重大损失的参考要素及完善公司司法解散方式,以解决公司司法解散制度运行中的问题。

Judicial dissolution of a company refers to the remedy for the dissolution of a company when the company has an insurmountable impasse,and the eligible subject under the law appeals to the court for a judgment.The exercising shareholders,the defendant company and the court judgment are the three main bodies of the company judicial dissolution system.Article 182 of the Company Law of the People′s Republic of China stipulates vague provisions on the application of the company judicial dissolution system,which leads to different standards for the judgment.Through the empirical analysis,three problems are exposed in the system of judicial dissolution of companies in China:First,the identification of"other serious difficulties"is not clear;Second,the standard of heavy loss can not be determined;Third,judicial dissolution measures are not comprehensive enough.So,it is necessary to refine the identification standard of"other serious difficulties",widen the reference elements of"heavy loss"and perfect the way of judicial dissolution of the company so as to solve the existing problem of judicial dissolution of the company.