期刊文献+

单颗后牙种植修复体咬合特征改变的临床研究 被引量:3

Clinical study on occlusal characteristics of single posterior dental implant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究单颗后牙种植修复体咬合特征的改变。方法前瞻性研究选取2017年1月至2018年8月于承德市口腔医院接受单颗后牙种植修复治疗的30例患者作为研究对象,将同一患者的种植修复体作为种植牙组,以其对侧的同名天然牙作为天然牙组。分别采用T-scan咬合分析仪记录修复完成时以及修复3个月后种植体与其对侧同名天然牙的咬合力百分比以及咬合接触时间。比较种植牙修复完成时、修复1年后的红色美学评分(PES)。结果种植牙组修复3个月后咬合力百分比(9.64±0.50)%高于修复完成时(4.72±0.44)%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);种植牙组修复完成时、修复3个月后咬合力百分比均低于天然牙组(12.32±0.62)%、(12.29±0.65)%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。种植牙组修复3个月后咬合接触时间(0.04±0.02)s,低于修复完成时的(0.08±0.02)s,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);种植牙组修复完成时、修复3个月后咬合接触时间均高于天然牙组(0.02±0.01)s、(0.02±0.01)s,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。种植牙修复完成时以及修复1年后的各项PES评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论单颗后牙种植修复3个月后咬合特征出现改变,提示在临床工作中应重视对种植修复体咬合的定期复查。同时种植修复1年后的PES评分仍较为稳定,具有较好的软组织美学效果。 Objective To study the occlusal characteristics of single posterior dental implants.Methods Perspective study of a total of 30 patients who received single posterior tooth implantation and repair treatment in Chengde Stomatological Hospital from January 2017 to August 2018 were included as study objects.The implantation restoration of the same patient was used as the implant group,and the natural teeth of the same name of patients on the opposite side were used as the natural tooth group.T-scan occlusal analyzer was used to record the bite force percentage and occlusal contact time of the implant and its opposite eponymous natural tooth at the time of restoration and 3 months after restoration,and statistical analysis was performed.Pink ethetic score(PES)score at the time of restoration and 1 year after restoration of all dental implants were compared.Results The percentage of bite force in the implant group 3 months after restoration(9.64±0.50)%was higher than that after restoration(4.72±0.44)%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The percentage of bite force in the implant group was lower than that in the natural tooth group at the time of restoration and 3 months after restoration(12.32±0.62)%,(12.29±0.65)%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The occlusal contact time of the implant group 3 months after restoration(0.04±0.02)s was lower than that after restoration(0.08±0.02)s,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The occlusal contact time of the implant group was higher than that of the natural tooth group at the completion of restoration and 3 months after restoration(0.02±0.01)s,(0.02±0.01)s,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).PES scores of implant restoration and 1 year after restoration were not significantly different(P>0.05).Conclusion The occlusal characteristics of single posterior teeth were changed after 3 months of dental implant restoration,which suggested that regular review of dental implant occlusion should be paid attention to in clinical practice.
作者 李英英 王雪峰 杨占宝 LI Ying-ying;WANG Xue-feng;YAN Zhan-bao(Medical Evaluation and Guidance Center,Chengde City Health and Health Committee,Chengde Hebei 067000,China;Department of Stomatology,Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College,Chengde Hebei 067000,China;Department of Geriatric Stomatology,Chengde Stomatological Hospital,Hebei Province,Chengde Hebei 067000,China)
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2019年第20期2230-2233,共4页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
基金 河北省科学技术厅科学技术成果项目(编号:20132389)
关键词 单颗后牙种植 咬合特征 种植修复体 咬合接触时间 咬合力百分比 Single posterior dental implant Occlusal characteristics Implant prostheses Occlusal contact time Bite force percentage
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献94

  • 1罗晨晨.不同形态牙合面固位螺钉对种植牙单冠稳定性的影响[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2009,14(2):44-44. 被引量:3
  • 2张志勇.种植与颌骨功能性重建[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2006,41(3):154-157. 被引量:5
  • 3Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. Periodontal diseas- es [J]. Lancet,2005,366(9499) : 1809-1820.
  • 4Umeda M, Takeuchi Y, Noguehi K, et al. Effects of nonsurgical periodontal therapy on the microbiota [J]. Periodontology 2000, 2004(36) :98-120.
  • 5Jahangiri L, Devlin H, Ting K, et al. Current perspectives in re- sidual ridge remodeling and its clinical implications: a re- view [ J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 1998,80(2): 224-237.
  • 6Agarwal G, Thomas R, Mehta D. Postextraction maintenance of the alveolar ridge: rationale and review [J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent,2012,33(5): 320-324,326.
  • 7Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, et al. Preservation of al- veolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable mem- branes [J]. J Periodontol, 1998,69(9) : 1044-1049.
  • 8Bartee BK. Extraction site reconstruction for alveolar ridge pres- ervation. Part 1 : rationale and materials selection [J]. J Oral Im- plantol,2001,27(4) : 187-193.
  • 9Hoffmann O, Bartee BK, Beaumont C, et al. Alveolar bone preser- vation in extraction sockets using non-resorbable dPTFE mem- branes:a retrospective non-randomized study [J]. J Periodontol, 2008,79(8) : 1355-1369.
  • 10Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clini- cal and radiographic 12-month prospective study [J]. Int J Peri- odontics Restorative Dent, 2003,23 (4) : 313-323.

共引文献111

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部