期刊文献+

数字评分法在脊髓损伤患者感觉异常关键点评分中的信度 被引量:14

Test-retest Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability of Numerical Rating Scale for Abnormal Sensation Points of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的检验数字评分法在脊髓损伤感觉异常关键点评分中的重测信度和评测者间信度。方法2016年10月至2018年10月,采用数字评分法对69例脊髓损伤患者的感觉异常关键点进行评分。评测者A对关键点进行第一次评分,次日评测者B对同一关键点进行再次评分。3周后由评测者A再次对同一患者进行评分。结果两侧肢体针刺觉评分和轻触觉评分的重测信度(r>0.88,P<0.001)和评测者间信度(ICC>0.93,P<0.001)均良好。颈段、胸段和腰段针刺觉评分和轻触觉评分的重测信度(r>0.88,P<0.001)和评测者间信度(ICC>0.93,P<0.001)均良好。结论数字评分法在脊髓损伤患者感觉异常关键点评分中具有良好的重测信度和评测者间信度。 Objective To investigate the test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability of Numerical Rating Scale(NRS)for abnormal sensation points of patients with spinal cord injury(SCI).Methods From October,2016 to December,2018,69 patients with SCI were enrolled.Their impaired sensory points were measured with NRS.The score of sensory points was tested by examiner A firstly,and examiner B did the same work next day.Then,the examiner A retested the same patients after three weeks.Results The Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)of the test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability for sensory score of both sides were all above 0.88 and 0.93 respectively(P<0.001).The Pearson correlation coefficients and ICC of the sensory score of the different injury levels were all above 0.88 and 0.93 respectively(P<0.001).Conclusion NRS has high test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability for the assessment at abnormal sensation points of patients with SCI.
作者 王一吉 周红俊 袁媛 刘根林 郑樱 郝春霞 张缨 卫波 康海琼 逯晓蕾 蒙倩茹 WANG Yi-ji;ZHOU Hong-jun;YUAN Yuan;LIU Gen-lin;ZHENG Ying;HAO Chun-xia;ZHANG Ying;WEI Bo;KANG Hai-qiong;LU Xiao-lei;MENG Qian-ru(Beijing Bo'ai Hospital,China Rehabilitation Research Center,Beijing 100068,China;Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine,Beijing 100068,China;Fujita Healthy University,Nagoya 4701192,Japan)
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第10期1117-1119,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
基金 中国康复研究中心科研基金项目(No.2015ZX-2)~~
关键词 脊髓损伤 数字评分法 感觉功能 信度 spinal cord injury Numerical Rating Scale sensory function reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献55

  • 1王方永,李建军,洪毅.中国人ASIA2000标准运动评分效度初步研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(11):932-933. 被引量:5
  • 2Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia[J].Paraplegia,1969,7:179-192.
  • 3Bracken MB, Webb SB Jr, Wagner FC. Classification of the severity of acute spinal cord injury: Implications for management[J].Paraplegia,1978:15:319-326.
  • 4Lucas JT, Ducker TB. Motor classification of spinal cord injuries with mobility, morbidity and recovery indices[J].Am Surg,1979,45:151-158.
  • 5Klose KJ, Green BA, Smith RS, et al. University of Miami Neuro-Spinal Index (UMNI): A quantitative method for determining spinal cord function[J].Paraplegia,1980,18:331-336.
  • 6Chehrazi B, Wagner FC Jr, Collins WF Jr, et al. A scale for evaluation of spinal cord injury[J].J Neurosurg,1981,54:310-315.
  • 7Tator CH, Rowed DW, Schwartz ML. Sunnybrook Cord Injury Scales for assessing neurological injury and neurological recovery[A].in Tator CH. Early Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury[C].New York:Raven Press,1982.17-24.
  • 8Botsford DJ, Esses SI. A new scale for the clinical assessment of spinal cord function[J].Orthopedics,1992,15:1309-1313.
  • 9American Spinal Injury Association. Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Injury Patients[M].Chicago:American Spinal Injury Association,1984.
  • 10American Spinal Injury Association. Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Injury Patients[M].Chicago:American Spinal Injury Association,1989.

共引文献12

同被引文献149

引证文献14

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部