期刊文献+

不同时长北斗基线精度差异分析 被引量:4

Analysis on the Difference of Accuracy of Beidou Baseline at Different Duration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 北斗导航系统已经可以为亚太地区提供导航服务,其中精度的测试和评估是目前研究的热点。本文以4个连续观测站的观测数据为基础,进行了不同时长静态基线解算,并与精确定位结果进行比较,发现静态解算精度优于3 cm,E、U、V三个方向的向量精度随着基线观测时长的增加而提高。同时进行北斗动态单历元基线解算,与精确定位结果相比,计算发现北斗单历元动态基线解算精度优于0.2 m,并且E、U、V三个方向的向量精度随着基线观测时间的长度增加而提高,有趋于稳定的趋势。比较结果表明,北斗系统具有良好的稳定性,监测时间越长,定位精度越高。 The Beidou navigation system has been able to provide navigation services for the Asia-Pacific region.Accuracy testing and evaluation are currently hot topics.Based on the observation data of four continuous observationstations,this paper carries out static baseline calculations of different durations and compares them with accurate-point positioning results.It is found that the static solution accuracy is better than 3 cm,and the vector accuracy in three directions of E,U and V is Increased with the increase in baseline observation duration.At the same time,the Beidou dynamic single epoch baseline solution was compared with the accurate point positioning results.It was found that the accuracy of the Beidou single epoch dynamic baseline solution was better than 0.2 m,and the vector accuracy in the three directions of E,U,and V along with the baseline The length of observation time increases and increases,and tends to be stable.The comparison results show that the Beidou system has good stability,the longer the monitoring time,the higher the positioning accuracy.
作者 陈学锦 CHEN Xuejin(Nonferrous Metal Geology Bureau of Guangdong Provinces 931 Battalion,Shantou Guangdong 515000,China)
出处 《北京测绘》 2019年第10期1245-1249,共5页 Beijing Surveying and Mapping
关键词 北斗导航系统 时长差异 静态基线解算 动态单历元基线解算 精度评定 Beidou navigation system difference in duration static baseline solution dynamic single epoch baseline solution accuracy assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献58

  • 1王霞迎,秘金钟.GPS/BDS静态基线处理方法及其结果分析[J].导航定位学报,2013,1(2):71-73. 被引量:10
  • 2唐旭,何秀凤.北斗卫星导航系统高精度相对定位性能分析[J].导航定位学报,2013,1(3):28-30. 被引量:20
  • 3韩绍伟.GPS相位观测值的模糊度函数法与最小二乘法的等价性及模糊度函数法的改进[J].测绘学报,1994,23(4):282-288. 被引量:6
  • 4Catalan C, Hernaindez C, Mozo A, et al. Improved integrity concept for future GNSS evolutions. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2008), Savannah, GA, September 2008. 2547-2557.
  • 5Kirchner M, Schmidt R, Vilzmann J. Results of GIOVE data processing to allow evaluation of principal system performance drivers. In: Proceedings of the European Navigation Conference-Global Navigation Satellite Systems. http://www.enc-gnss09.it/proceedingsPDF/ D2/7_D2.pdf.
  • 6Rooney E, Unwin M, Gatti G, et al. GIOVE-A and GIOVE-A2 Orbit Testing Results. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Technical Meeting (ION GNSS), 25-28 September 2007, Fort Worth, Texas, USA (Institute of Navigation, Alexandria, Virginia). 467-477.
  • 7Liu J N, Ge M R. PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci, 2003, 8: 603-609.
  • 8Shi C, Zhao Q L, Geng J H, et al. Recent development of PANDA software in GNSS data processing, In: Proceedings of the Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers, 2008, 7285: 72851S, doi: 10.1117/12.816261.
  • 9Steigenberger P, Hugentobler U, Montenbruck O, et al. Precise orbit determination of GIOVE-B based on the CONGO network. J Geodesy 2011, 85:357-365.
  • 10Liu Z Z. A new automated cycle slip detection and repair method for a single dual-frequency GPS receiver. J Geodesy, 2010, 85:171-183.

共引文献269

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部