监察委员会监督机制的比较研究

A Comparative Consideration on the Supervision Mechanism of the Supervisory Committee

在监察制度改革初期,决策层通过设置多项监督机制初步回答了“谁来监督监察委”之问。但现有监督制度还存在外部监督力度有限、缺乏有效抓手,过度依赖内部流程的风险控制等隐忧。为了实现反腐败工作法治化、规范化的要求,相关监督机制除坚持自身行之有效的做法外,还应同时充分借鉴香港廉政公署相关监督机制的理念、思路。在强化内部监督的基础上,拓宽外部监督的渠道;保障静态监督与动态监督双管齐下;同时根据反腐败工作的发展阶段,逐步调整监察制度的价值取向,由发现客观真实转向保障基本权利与正当程序。

In the early stage of the supervision system reform,the question of“who will supervise the supervision committee”is primarily solved by setting up a number of supervisory mechanisms.However,the existing supervision system still has hidden problems such as limited external supervision,lack of effective mechanisms,and excessive reliance on internal risk control.In order to achieve the requirements of legalization and standardization of anti-corruption campaign,in addition to adhering to its own effective practices,the relevant supervision mechanism should also fully draw on the concepts and ideas of the Independent Commission Against Corruption of Hong Kong.On the basis of strengthening internal supervision,we will broaden the channels for external supervision;guarantee the dual supervision of static supervision and dynamic supervision;and gradually adjust the value orientation of the supervision system according to the development stage of anti-corruption work,from the finding the objective reality to the protection of basic rights and due process.