期刊文献+

X-CONE经脐单通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊疾病的疗效 被引量:2

Surgical efficacy of X-CONE trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of gallbladder diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨X-CONE经脐单通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊疾病的疗效。方法回顾性分析402例接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的临床资料,根据手术方式将其分为单孔组(X-CONE经脐单通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术)181例及传统组(三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术)221例,比较2组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、并发症、疼痛评分及住院总费用等指标。结果402例患者均顺利完成腹腔镜胆囊切除术,无中转开腹者。单孔组181例中98.3%(178/181)成功完成X-CONE经脐单通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术,3例中转接受传统三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术。2组患者术中出血量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。单孔组手术时间长于传统组(P<0.05),但其术后住院时间、胆囊窝积液、住院总费用均优于传统组(P均<0.05)。单孔组的术后第1日疼痛程度弱于传统组(P<0.05)。2组均无伤口感染、胆漏、腹腔出血、胆道损伤等并发症。术后随访12~24个月,无患者出现脐疝、胆道狭窄等并发症,所有患者对美容效果均满意。结论X-CONE经脐单通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊疾病安全可靠,患者恢复快,费用少。 Objective To evaluate the surgical efficacy of X-CONE trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of gallbladder diseases.Methods Clinical data of 402 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively analyzed.According to the surgical approaches,all patients were divided into the single-port group(n=181,X-CONE trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy)and the traditional group(n=221,three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy).The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,length of postoperative hospital stay,postoperative complications,pain score and total hospitalization expenses were statistically compared between two groups.Results All 402 patients successfully completed the laparoscopic cholecystectomy with no switch to open surgery.Of the 181 cases in the single-port group,178 patients(98.3%)successfully completed the X-CONE trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy,and 3 cases were switched to conventional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Intraoperative blood loss did not significantly differ between two groups(P>0.05).The operation time in the single-port group was significantly longer than that in the traditional group(P<0.05).However,the length of postoperative hospital stay,cystic fossa effusion and hospitalization expense in the single-port group were remarkably better compared with those in the traditional group(all P<0.05).In the single-port group,the severity of pain at postoperative 1 d was considerably less than that in the traditional group(P<0.05).No wound infection,bile leakage,abdominal hemorrhage,biliary tract injury or other complications were observed in two groups.During postoperative follow-up for 12-24 months,no umbilical hernia,biliary stricture or other complications were found.All patients were satisfied with the cosmetic effect.Conclusion X-CONE trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and reliable treatment of gallbladder diseases,which yields fast recovery and low cost.
作者 陈斯聪 缪丁丁 Chen Sicong;Miao Dingding(Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery,Shenzhen Nanshan People’s Hospital,Shenzhen 518052,China)
出处 《新医学》 2019年第11期822-825,共4页 Journal of New Medicine
基金 深圳市南山区科技计划区属事业单位研发资助项目(2018077)
关键词 X-CONE 经脐单通道腹腔镜手术 胆囊切除术 X-CONE Trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery Cholecystectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献45

  • 1Yasumitsu Hirano,Toru Watanabe,Tsuneyuki Uchida,Shuhei Yoshida,Kanae Tawaraya,Hideaki Kato,Osamu Hosokawa.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy:Single institution experience and literature review[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(2):270-274. 被引量:23
  • 2王宏光,陈训如,罗丁,毛静熙,周正东,余少明,李胜宏.腹腔镜胆囊切除术13000例的并发症分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(3):167-168. 被引量:94
  • 3刘毅,秦明放.腹腔镜胆囊切除术在肝硬化病人中的应用[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(7):514-516. 被引量:19
  • 4Wheeless CR Jr. Outpatient laparoscope sterilization un- der local anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol, 1972, 39 ( 5 ) : 767 -770.
  • 5Mettler L, Hucke J, Bojahr B, Tinneberg HR, Ley- land N, Avelar R. A safety and efficacy study of a resorbable hydrogel for reduction of post-operative adhe- sions following myomectomy. Hum Reprod, 2008, 23 (5) : 1093-1100.
  • 6Torch TA, Pybus DA. Extradural administration of mor- phine and bupivacaine: A controlled comparison. Br J Anaesth, 1984, 56 (2): 141-146.
  • 7Park JH, Hyun KH, Park CH, Choi SY, Choi WH, Kim D J, Lee S, Kim JS. Laparoscopic vs transumbili- cal single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: results of prospective randomized trial. J Korean Surg Soc, 2010, 78 (4): 213-218.
  • 8Baik SM, Hong KS, Kim YI. A comparison of transum- bilical single-port laparoseopic appendectomy and con- ventional three-port laparoseopie appendectomy: from the diagnosis to the hospital cost. J Korean Surg Soc, 2013, 85 (2): 68-74.
  • 9Kim HO, Yoo CH, Lee SR, Son BH, Park YL, Shin JH, Kim H, Han WK. Pain after laparoseopic appen- dectomy: a comparison of transumbilical single-port and conventional laparoseopie surgery. J Korean Surg Soc, 2012, 82 (3): 172-178.
  • 10Wood SG, Dai F, Dabu-Bondoc S, et at.Transvaginal cholecys- tectomy learning curve [J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(7): 1837-1841.

共引文献57

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部