公司决议瑕疵相关问题探究——兼论《公司法司法解释四》第1-6条

Research on the Relevant Issues of Defective Corporate Resolution ——On Article 1-6 of the《Judicial Interpretation Ⅳ of Company Law》 Concurrently

公司决议法律性质的准确界定,是从本源上解决公司决议瑕疵制度诸多问题的基础。分析公司决议的法律性质,应基于公司机关成员、公司机关和公司这三个不同主体的视角分别展开。在《公司法司法解释四》对公司决议瑕疵的分类采取“三分法”模式的背景下,需结合构成要件和内容/程序瑕疵的严重程度对决议的“不成立”与“可撤销”进行界分。《公司法司法解释四》对撤销公司决议之诉适格原告的设计尚有值得商榷之处。在分析公司决议瑕疵的法律后果时,应从对内—对外的视角分别审视。

Defining the legal nature of corporate resolution accurately is the basis of solving numerous issues in defective corporate resolution regime thoroughly.The analysis of the legal nature of corporate resolution should be carried out from the perspective of the three different subjects:members of corporate organs,corporate organs and corporate itself.Under the background that the《Judicial Interpretation IV of Company Law》adopts the"three-point method"to classify the flaws of the company's resolutions,it is necessary to distinguish the"non establishment"and"revocability"of the resolution in combination with the constituent elements and the severity of the content/procedural defects.The《Judicial Interpretation IV of Company Law》still has something to discuss about the design of the suit suit plaintiff of revoking the company resolution.When analyzing the legal consequences of the flaws in the company's resolutions,we should examine them from the perspective of internal and external.