期刊文献+

西达本胺联合氟达拉滨治疗复发急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效及安全性分析 被引量:5

The efficacy and safety of chidamide combined with fludarabine in the treatment of recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨西达本胺联合氟达拉滨治疗复发急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效及安全性。方法根据随机数字表法将124例复发急性淋巴细胞白血病患者分为对照组和观察组各62例,对照组只使用氟达拉滨治疗,观察组采用西达本胺联合氟达拉滨联合治疗。对比两组治疗1个周期后疗效,治疗前、治疗1个周期时血清生化标志物表达水平,生存质量差异,随访3年记录两组复发率、生存率及治疗期间不良反应发生率。结果治疗1个周期后观察组总有效率高于对照组,且两组完全缓解、部分缓解、未缓解率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与治疗前比较,治疗1个周期患者血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)水平均下降,WHOQOL BREF评分均升高,且同期观察组较对照组变化更显著(P<0.05)。观察组1年复发率和3年复发率均低于对照组,而1年生存率和3年生存率均高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗期间,两组不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论西达本胺联合氟达拉滨对复发急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的治疗效果优于氟达拉滨单一用药,能显著提升患者短期生存质量和长期生存率,且用药安全性较好,可应用于复发急性淋巴细胞白血病的临床治疗中。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of chidamide combined with fludarabine in the treatment of recur rent acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Methods A total of 124 patients with recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia were divided into control group and observation group according to the random number table method,62 in each group.The control group was treated with fludarabine only,and the observation group was given chidamide combined with fludarabine.The efficacy after 1 cycle of treatment,and expression levels of serum biochemical markers and quality of life before treatment and after 1 cycle of treatment were compared between the two groups.The recurrence rate,survival rate and incidence rate of toxic and side effects during treatment were recorded during 3 years of follow up in the two groups.Results After 1 cycle of treatment,the overall effective rate(OR)in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group,and there were statistically significant differences in the complete remission(CR),partial remission(PR)and non remission(NR)between the two groups(all P<0.05).Compared with before treatment,serum LDH and ADA levels were significantly decreased after 1 cycle of treatment,and the WHOQOL BREF scores were significantly increased,and the changes in the observation group were more significant than those in the control group(all P<0.05).The 1 year recurrence rate and 3 year recurrence rate in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group,and the 1 year survival rate and 3 year survival rate were significantly higher than those in control group(all P<0.05).During treatment period,the total incidence rate of toxic and side effects in the observation group was not significantly different from that in the control group(P>0.05).Conclu sion Chidamide combined with fludarabine has better treatment effects than fludarabine alone in the treatment of patients with recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia.The combined therapy can significantly improve the short term quality of life and long term survival rate,and it has good medication safety.Therefore,it can be used in the clinical treatment of recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
作者 章嘉 任伶俐 龚小琴 王珲 ZHANG Jia;REN Ling li;GONG Xiao qin;WANG Hun(Department of Hematology,The Affiliated Hospital,North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong 637000,China;Peng'an Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Peng'an 637800,China)
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2019年第6期120-123,共4页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词 西达本胺 氟达拉滨 复发急性淋巴细胞白血病 疗效 安全性 Chidamide Fludarabine Recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献92

  • 1W-S. Chung,Y-C. Chang,M-C. Yang,胡旸(译),屠德华(校),张立兴(审).传染性肺结核治疗成功的影响因素[J].国际结核病与肺部疾病杂志,2007,2(1):36-41. 被引量:2
  • 2SKORKINA M Y, FEDOROVA M Z, MURAVYOV A V, et al. The use of nanomechanic sensor for studies of morphofunctional properties of lymphocytes from healthy donors and patients with chronic lympho- blastic leukemia [ J]. Bull Exp Biol Med, 2012, 154 ( 1 ) : 163 - 166.
  • 3ROMANO C, SELLITrO A, CHIURAZZt F, et al. Clinical and pheno- typic features of CD5 - negative B cell chronic lymphoproliferative dis- ease resembling chronic lymphocytic leukemia[ J ]. Int J Hematol, 2015, 101 (1) :67 -74.
  • 4Haferlach T, Kern W, Sclmittger S, et al. Modern diagnostics in acute leukemias [ J ]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2005, 56 (2) :223- 234. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.04.008.
  • 5Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia [J]. Blood, 2016, 127 (20):2391-2405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03 -643544.
  • 6NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology--Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (2016 Version I) [DB/OL]. http:// www.nccn.org.
  • 7Haferlach T, Bacher U, Kern W, et al. Diagnostic pathways in acute leukemias: a proposal for a multimodal approach [J]. Ann Hematol, 2007, 86(5):311-327. doi: 10.1007/s00277-007-0253- 2.
  • 8Bene MC, Castoldi G, Knapp W, et al. Proposals for the immunological classification of acute leukemias. European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL) [J]. Leukemia, 1995, 9( 10):1783-1786.
  • 9Bene MC, Bemier M, Casasnovas RO, et al. The reliability and specificity of c-kit for the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemias and undifferentiated leukemias. The European Group for the Immunological Classification of Leukemias (EGIL) [ J ]. Blood, 1998, 92(2):596-599.
  • 10G6kbuget N, Hoelzer D. Treatment of adult acute lymphoblasticleukemia[Jl. Semin Hematol, 2009, 46( 1 ):64-75. doi: 10.1053/ j .seminhematol.2008.09.003.

共引文献467

同被引文献56

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部