期刊文献+

IPSS-V/S在TUVP术后下尿路症状评估的临床价值 被引量:8

Clinical value of international prostatic symptom score-voiding/storage subscore ratio in assessing lower urinary tract symptoms after transurethral electrovaporization prostatectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨国际前列腺症状评分的排尿期/储尿期评分比值(international prostatic symptom score-voiding/storage subscore ratio,IPSS-V/S)在经尿道前列腺汽化电切术(transurethral electrovaporization prostatectomy,TUVP)术后下尿路症状(lower urinary tract symptoms,LUTS)再评估的临床价值。方法:回顾性分析了2015年1月至2016年12月期间234例接受TUVP的良性前列腺增生(benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH)患者的国际前列腺症状评分(international prostatic symptom score,IPSS)等临床资料。按照IPSS-V/S比值将患者分为A组(IPSS-V/S≤1,80例)和B组(IPSS-V/S>1,154例)。术后6个月再次评估IPSS,储尿期症状评分(international prostatic symptom score-storage,IPSS-S),排尿期症状评分(international prostatic symptom score-voiding,IPSS-V)和生活质量评分(quality of life,QOL)。结果:234例患者术后6个月IPSS和QOL较术前明显降低,差异有统计学意义(t=33.0,P=0.000;t=34.3,P=0.000)。术后6个月B组患者IPSS改善程度明显优于A组[(12.36±3.67)分vs.(8.20±3.21)分](t=8.96,P=0.000)。其中A组术后6个月IPSS-S明显高于B组[(9.61±2.88)分vs.(5.55±2.63)分](t=10.8,P=0.000);而2组患者术后6个月时IPSS-V对比无统计学差异(t=1.56,P=0.120)。虽然A组术后6个月的QOL明显改善[(3.59±0.91)分vs.(5.19±0.55)分](t=14.8,P=0.000),但是基本满意及以上者仅占13.75%,明显低于B组的70.78%。A组术后6个月IPSS-S各症状评分均有一定改善,改善程度从高到低依次为尿急评分、尿频评分和夜尿评分,其中夜尿评分改善率最低,仅为36.3%(29/80),是A组患者IPSS及QOL改善较小的重要原因。结论:相比IPSS,IPSS-V/S更能准确反映TUVP术后疗效,LUTS排尿期症状改善明显优于储尿期症状。对于以夜尿症为主的BPH/LUTS患者,TUVP对患者QOL改善有限,需要引起临床医师重视。 Objective:To investigate the clinical value of international prostatic symptom score-voiding/storage subscore ratio(IPSS-V/S)in assessing lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS)after transurethral electrovaporization prostatectomy(TUVP). Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed for international prostatic symptom score(IPSS)and other clinical data of 234 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)who underwent TUVP from January 2015 to December 2016. According IPSS-V/S,these patients were divided into group A(80 patients with an IPSS-V/S≤1)and group B(154 patients with an IPSS-V/S>1). IPSS,international prostatic symptom score-voiding(IPSS-V)score,international prostatic symptom score-storage(IPSS-S)score,and quality of life(QOL)score were reassessed at 6 months after surgery. Results:All 234 patients had significant reductions in IPSS and QOL score at 6 months after surgery(t=33.0 and 34.3,both P=0.000). At 6 months after surgery,group B had a significantly greater improvement in IPSS than group A [(12.36 ±3.67) points vs.(8.20 ±3.21) points,t =8.96,P =0.000]. At 6 months after surgery,group A had a significantly higher IPSS-S score than group B [(9.61 ±2.88) points vs.(5.55 ±2.63)points,t=10.8,P=0.000],while there was no significant difference in IPSS-V score between the two groups(t=1.56,P=0.120). Although group A had a significant improvement in QOL score at 6 months after surgery[(3.59±0.91)points vs.(5.19±0.55)points,t=14.8,P=0.000],group A had a significantly lower satisfaction rate than group B(13.75% vs. 70.78%). At 6 months after surgery,group A had varying degrees of improvement in IPSS-S symptom scores,among which the score of urgency of urination showed the highest degree of improvement,followed by the scores of frequency of urination and nocturia;the score of nocturia had the lowest improvement rate of 36.3%(29/80),which was an important reason for the low degree of improvement in IPSS and QOL.Conclusion:Compared with IPSS,IPSS-V/S can reflect the outcome after TUVP more accurately,and voiding symptoms have significantly greater improvements than storage symptoms in LUTS. BPH/LUTS patients with nocturia as the main complaint have limited improvement in QOL after TUVP,which should be taken seriously by clinicians.
作者 陈一帆 陈卫国 蔡宗强 欧阳骏 浦金贤 Chen Yifan;Chen Weiguo;Cai Zongqiang;Ou Yangjun;Pu Jinxian(Department of Urology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University)
出处 《重庆医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第8期1089-1093,共5页 Journal of Chongqing Medical University
关键词 良性前列腺增生 经尿道前列腺汽化电切术 国际前列腺症状评分 储尿期症状评分 夜尿 benign prostatic hyperplasia transurethral electrovaporization prostatectomy International Prostate Symptom Score Inter national Prostate Symptom Score-Storage nocturia
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1程文,高建平,张征宇,葛京平,薛松.术前尿流动力学检查对TURP术后疗效预测的研究[J].中华男科学杂志,2005,11(3):207-209. 被引量:27
  • 2梅骅.关于进一步提高开放性前列腺切除术疗效的几点意见[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(3):131-132. 被引量:106
  • 3Muzzonigro G, Milanese G, Minardi D, et al. Safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of prostate glands up to 150 ml :a prospective comparative study with 1 year of followup[J]. The Journal of Urology, 2004, 172 (2) : 611-615.
  • 4Barry M J, Fowler F J, O lear M P, et al. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostate hyperplasia[J]. J Urol, 1992, 148:1549.
  • 5Cucchi A. The development of detrusor instability in prostatic obstructionin relation to sequential changes in voiding dynamics[J]. J Urol , 1994,151 : 1342 -1345.
  • 6Woderich R, Fowler C J. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with progressive neurological disease[J]. Current Opinion in Urology, 2006, 16 ( 1 ) : 130-36.
  • 7Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function:report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society[J]. Am J Obsetet Gyneco1,2002, 187( 1 ) : 116-126.
  • 8Van Kerrebroeck P, Abrams P, Chaikin D, et al. The standardisation of terminology in nocturia : report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2002,21 (2) : 179-183.
  • 9Schatzl G,TemmL C, Schmidbauer J, et al. Cross-sectional study of noc- turia in both sexes:analysis of a vo|untary health screening project [J]. Urology, 2000,56( 1 ) :71-75.
  • 10Matthiesen TB, Rittig S, Norgaard JP, et al. Nocturnal polyuria and na- triuresis in male patients with nocturia and lower urinary tract symptoms[J]. J Urol, 1996,156(4) : 1292-1299.

共引文献30

同被引文献77

引证文献8

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部