期刊文献+

CT平扫岛征和混合征对自发性脑出血患者早期血肿扩大的预测作用 被引量:35

Predictive values of island signs and blend signs on non-contrast CT in early hematoma enlargement of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨自发性脑出血患者(sICH)头颅CT平扫的岛征和混合征及其联合征象对早期血肿扩大的预测作用。方法连续纳入2015年1月至2017年12月成都市温江区人民医院神经外科收治的sICH患者84例。患者从发病到首次CT检查时间均≤6 h,首次CT复查时间均≤24 h,根据2次检查结果将患者分为早期血肿扩大组(35例)和血肿无扩大组(49例)。回顾性分析CT平扫的岛征和混合征及联合征象对早期血肿扩大的影响,及其对早期血肿增大的诊断效能。结果CT平扫显示,早期血肿扩大组有岛征者占60.0%(21/35),有混合征者占71.4%(25/35);与血肿未扩大组的14.3%(7/49)、24.5%(12/49)比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,岛征(OR=12.720,95%CI:3.501~46.218,P<0.01)和混合征(OR=10.793,95%CI:3.172~36.727,P<0.01)均为血肿早期扩大的独立预测因素。岛征诊断血肿早期扩大的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及约登指数分别为60.0%、85.7%、75.0%、75.0%、45.7%,混合征分别为71.4%、75.5%、67.6%、78.7%、46.9%,岛征联合混合征分别为91.4%、63.3%、64.0%、91.2%、54.7%。结论岛征、混合征均为sICH患者血肿早期扩大的独立预测因素。岛征联合混合征对血肿早期扩大的诊断效能较单一征象高。 Objective To explore the predictive values of island signs and blend signs on non-contrast CT in early hematoma enlargement of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage(sICH).Methods A total of 84 patients with sICH were admitted to Department of Neurosurgery,Wenjiang District People′s Hospital of Chengdu from January 2015 to December 2017 and consecutively enrolled into this study.The time from onset to the first CT examination was≤6 h,and the second CT examination time was≤24 h.According to the results of those 2 examinations,the patients were divided into the early hematoma enlargement group(35 cases)and the hematoma non-enlargement group(49 cases).The effects of CT island signs and blend signs on early hematoma enlargement and their diagnostic efficacy for early hematoma enlargement were analyzed.Results Non-contrast CT scan showed that 60.0%(21/35)in the early hematoma enlargement group had island sign,and 71.4%(25/35)had blend sign.Compared with 14.3%(7/49)and 24.5%(12/49)in non-enlargement group,those differences were statistically significant(both P<0.01).Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that both island sign(OR=12.720,95%CI:3.501-46.218,P<0.01)and blend sign(OR=10.793,95%CI:3.172-36.727,P=0.01)were independent predictors of early hematoma enlargement.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and Youden index of island sign for early hematoma enlargement were 60.0%,85.7%,75.0%,75.0%and 45.7%respectively.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and Youden index of blend sign for early hematoma enlargement were 71.4%,75.5%,67.6%,78.7%and 46.9%respectively.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and Youden index of island sign combined with blend sign for early hematoma enlargement were 91.4%,63.3%,64.0%,91.2%and 54.7%respectively.Conclusions Island sign and blend sign are independent predictors of early enlargement of hematoma.The diagnostic performance with the combination of island sign and blend sign seems higher than the that of either single indicator.
作者 贾维 石长青 刘亚龙 李文勇 Jia Wei;Shi Changqing;Liu Yalong;Li Wenyong(Department of Radiology,Wenjiang District People′s Hospital of Chengdu,Chengdu 611130,China;Department of Neurosurgery,Wenjiang District People′s Hospital of Chengdu,Chengdu 611130,China)
出处 《中华神经外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第10期1036-1040,共5页 Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery
基金 四川省卫健委医学科研课题(18PJ427)。
关键词 自发性脑出血 X线计算机体层扫描 血肿扩大 岛征 混合征 Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage X-ray computed tomography Hematoma enlargement Island sign Blend sign
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1Zahuranec DB, Lisabeth LD, Sanchez BN, et al. Intracerebralhemorrhage mortality is not changing despite declining incidence[J].Neurology, 2014, 82(24): 2180-2186.
  • 2Gattellari M, Goumas C, Worthington J. Declining rates of fatal andnonfatal intracerebral hemorrhage: epidemiological trends inAustralia[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2014, 3(6): e001161.
  • 3Gotoh S, Hata J, Ninomiya T, et al. Trends in the incidence andsurvival of intracerebral hemorrhage by its location in a Japanesecommunity[J]. Circ J, 2014, 78(2): 403-409.
  • 4Zia E, Engstrom G, Svensson PJ, et al. Three-year survival and strokerecurrence rates in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Stroke, 2009, 40(11): 3567-3573.
  • 5Banos-Gonzalez M, Cantu-Brito C, Chiquete E, et al.Systolic bloodpressure and functional outcome in patients with acute stroke: aMexican registry of acute cerebrovascular disease (RENAMEVASC)[J]. Arch Cardiol Mex, 2011, 81(3): 169-175.
  • 6Anderson CS, Heeley E, Huang Y, et al. Rapid blood-pressurelowering in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. N Engl JMed, 2013, 368(25): 2355-2365.
  • 7Tetri S, Huhtakangas J, Juvela S, et al. Better than expected survivalafter primary intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with untreated hypertension despite high admission blood pressures[J]. Eur J Neurol,2010, 17(5): 708-714.
  • 8Anderson CS, Huang Y, Arima H, et al. Effects of early intensiveblood pressure-lowering treatment on the growth of hematoma andperihematomal edema in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: theIntensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral HaemorrhageTrial (INTERACT) [J]. Stroke, 2010, 41(2): 307-312.
  • 9Grise EM, Adeoye O. Blood pressure control for acute ischemic andhemorrhagic stroke[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2012, 18(2): 132-138.
  • 10Arima H, Huang Y, Wang JG, et al. Earlier blood pressure-loweringand greater attenuation of hematoma growth in acute intracerebralhemorrhage: INTERACT pilot phase[J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(8):2236-2238.

共引文献40

同被引文献224

引证文献35

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部